心理学
复杂度
认知
公共领域
同时有效性
内容有效性
外部有效性
样品(材料)
现存分类群
测试有效性
增量有效性
资源(消歧)
心理测量学
度量(数据仓库)
认知心理学
发展心理学
社会心理学
计算机科学
数据挖掘
社会科学
化学
内部一致性
社会学
神经科学
哲学
生物
进化生物学
色谱法
计算机网络
神学
作者
David Condon,William Revelle
出处
期刊:Intelligence
[Elsevier]
日期:2014-02-14
卷期号:43: 52-64
被引量:372
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
摘要
For all of its versatility and sophistication, the extant toolkit of cognitive ability measures lacks a public-domain method for large-scale, remote data collection. While the lack of copyright protection for such a measure poses a theoretical threat to test validity, the effective magnitude of this threat is unknown and can be offset by the use of modern test-development techniques. To the extent that validity can be maintained, the benefits of a public-domain resource are considerable for researchers, including: cost savings; greater control over test content; and the potential for more nuanced understanding of the correlational structure between constructs. The International Cognitive Ability Resource was developed to evaluate the prospects for such a public-domain measure and the psychometric properties of the first four item types were evaluated based on administrations to both an offline university sample and a large online sample. Concurrent and discriminative validity analyses suggest that the public-domain status of these item types did not compromise their validity despite administration to 97,000 participants. Further development and validation of extant and additional item types are recommended.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI