亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Harmonic Scalpel Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Postoperative Hemorrhage

扁桃体切除术 医学 超声刀 随机对照试验 科克伦图书馆 奇纳 梅德林 外科 样本量测定 失血 心理干预 数学 护理部 政治学 统计 法学
作者
Codruta Neumann,Ian Street,David Lowe,Holger Sudhoff
出处
期刊:Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Wiley]
卷期号:137 (3): 378-384 被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.05.003
摘要

To systematically review the literature on harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy with a view of comparing its postoperative hemorrhagic rate with the conventional methods for tonsillectomy.Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, INAHTA, CRD (Centre for Review and Dissemination, York, UK), and related databases. The date of the last search was September 19, 2006; papers were considered irrespective of language of publication.Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied independently by two reviewers with a third reviewer available for adjudication. The papers were quality assessed using Chalmers' criteria. Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included in the final review with five RCTs comparing harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy with "cold steel" tonsillectomy and six RCTs comparing harmonic scalpel with "hot" tonsillectomy techniques.All studies were underpowered to detect a significant difference in the postoperative hemorrhagic complication between harmonic scalpel and the comparator tonsillectomy techniques. The heterogeneity of studies made quantitative combination of results impossible.The evidence reviewed is of low quality and does not support any significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage rates when harmonic scalpel is compared with other tonsillectomy techniques. As studies have numerous methodological flaws and incorporate biases and confounding factors, these results need to be interpreted with caution. Larger and better-conducted studies would be needed in order to compare the safety of harmonic against conventional tonsillectomy methods. The need for a large sample size might make an RCT impractical; therefore a large, well-controlled cohort study could be more suitable.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jasper应助豪横的肥豪采纳,获得10
5秒前
18秒前
科研通AI6.2应助haha采纳,获得10
19秒前
多洛塔完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
loii举报金色热浪求助涉嫌违规
33秒前
Owen应助元酒采纳,获得10
38秒前
48秒前
魏lin完成签到,获得积分20
50秒前
52秒前
魏lin发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
fouding发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
Aixx完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Bazinga发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
yoqalux完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
今后应助温暖幻桃采纳,获得10
1分钟前
可爱的函函应助阿斗采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Hedy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
田様应助Bazinga采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
abc完成签到 ,获得积分0
2分钟前
阿斗发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
赘婿应助fly采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Hedy完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
王佳佳发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
TBF完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
NexusExplorer应助王佳佳采纳,获得10
2分钟前
fly发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
大个应助思明采纳,获得30
2分钟前
李爱国应助群里有闺蜜采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
ON THE THEORY OF BIRATIONAL BLOWING-UP 666
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6389130
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8203661
关于积分的说明 17358412
捐赠科研通 5442677
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2878066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1854381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1697915