External fixation versus open reduction with plate fixation for distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

医学 破折号 握力 内固定 随机对照试验 外固定 荟萃分析 手腕 固定(群体遗传学) 外科 运动范围 相对风险 尺骨偏斜 口腔正畸科 置信区间 内科学 人口 外固定器 操作系统 环境卫生 计算机科学
作者
John G. Esposito,Emil H. Schemitsch,Michel Saccone,Amir Sternheim,Paul R. Kuzyk
出处
期刊:Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:44 (4): 409-416 被引量:92
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.003
摘要

Both external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) using plates have been recommended for treatment of distal radius fractures. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing external fixation to ORIF.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were searched from inception to January 2011 for all trials involving use of external fixation and ORIF for distal radius fractures. Eligibility for inclusion in the review was: use of random allocation of treatments; treatment arm receiving external fixation; and treatment arm receiving ORIF with plate fixation. Eligible studies were obtained and read in full by two co-authors who then independently applied the Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Nonpharmacological Trial. Pooled mean differences were calculated for the following continuous outcomes: wrist range of motion; radiographic parameters; grip strength; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for rates of complications and reoperation.The literature search strategy identified 52 potential publications of which nine publications (10 studies) met inclusion criteria. Pooled mean difference for DASH scores was significantly less for the ORIF with plate fixation group (-5.92, 95% C.I. of -9.89 to -1.96, p < 0.01, I(2) = 39%). Pooled mean difference for ulnar variance was significantly less in the ORIF with plate fixation group (-0.70, 95% C.I. of -1.20 to -0.19, p < 0.01, I(2) = 0%), indicating better restoration of radial length for this group. Pooled risk ratio for infection was 0.37 (95% C.I. of 0.19-0.73, p < 0.01, I(2) = 0%), favouring ORIF with plate fixation. There were no significant differences in all other clinical outcomes.ORIF with plate fixation provides lower DASH scores, better restoration of radial length and reduced infection rates as compared to external fixation for treatment of distal radius fractures.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dreamwalk完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
sunwsmile完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
柚子完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
烂漫笑晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
su完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
游01完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Medneuron完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Alvin完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
kyle完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
智者雨人完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
35秒前
嘚儿塔完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
43秒前
竹焚完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
Jasper应助Medneuron采纳,获得10
47秒前
王晓卉完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
leaolf完成签到,获得积分0
50秒前
壹z完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
南宫清涟完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
sponge完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
葱饼完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
学医的小胖子完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
火星上的柏柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
1分钟前
Never发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
孙老师完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
光亮若翠完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
首席或雪月完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Hunter完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
GPTea应助科研通管家采纳,获得150
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
pp完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
笨笨山芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
虞无声完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
science完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
muzi完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Zeolites: From Fundamentals to Emerging Applications 1500
Architectural Corrosion and Critical Infrastructure 1000
Early Devonian echinoderms from Victoria (Rhombifera, Blastoidea and Ophiocistioidea) 1000
Hidden Generalizations Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory 1000
2026国自然单细胞多组学大红书申报宝典 800
Real Analysis Theory of Measure and Integration 3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4910625
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4186398
关于积分的说明 12999415
捐赠科研通 3953889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2168175
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1186601
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1093802