Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study

医学 结肠镜检查 肠道准备 观察研究 优势比 置信区间 前瞻性队列研究 泻药 内科学 外科 胃肠病学 结直肠癌 癌症
作者
Eun Hee Seo,Tae Oh Kim,Min Jae Park,Hee Rin Joo,Nae‐Yun Heo,Jongha Park,Sungha Park,Sung Yeun Yang,Young Soo Moon
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:75 (3): 583-590 被引量:140
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.029
摘要

Background Several factors influence bowel preparation quality. Recent studies have indicated that the time interval between bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy is also important in determining bowel preparation quality. Objective To evaluate the influence of the preparation-to-colonoscopy (PC) interval (the interval of time between the last polyethylene glycol dose ingestion and the start of the colonoscopy) on bowel preparation quality in the split-dose method for colonoscopy. Design Prospective observational study. Setting University medical center. Patients A total of 366 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Intervention Split-dose bowel preparation and colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements The quality of bowel preparation was assessed by using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale according to the PC interval, and other factors that might influence bowel preparation quality were analyzed. Results Colonoscopies with a PC interval of 3 to 5 hours had the best bowel preparation quality score in the whole, right, mid, and rectosigmoid colon according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale. In multivariate analysis, the PC interval (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% CI, 1.18-2.86), the amount of PEG ingested (OR 4.34; 95% CI, 1.08-16.66), and compliance with diet instructions (OR 2.22l 95% CI, 1.33-3.70) were significant contributors to satisfactory bowel preparation. Limitations Nonrandomized controlled, single-center trial. Conclusions The optimal time interval between the last dose of the agent and the start of colonoscopy is one of the important factors to determine satisfactory bowel preparation quality in split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation. Several factors influence bowel preparation quality. Recent studies have indicated that the time interval between bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy is also important in determining bowel preparation quality. To evaluate the influence of the preparation-to-colonoscopy (PC) interval (the interval of time between the last polyethylene glycol dose ingestion and the start of the colonoscopy) on bowel preparation quality in the split-dose method for colonoscopy. Prospective observational study. University medical center. A total of 366 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Split-dose bowel preparation and colonoscopy. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed by using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale according to the PC interval, and other factors that might influence bowel preparation quality were analyzed. Colonoscopies with a PC interval of 3 to 5 hours had the best bowel preparation quality score in the whole, right, mid, and rectosigmoid colon according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale. In multivariate analysis, the PC interval (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% CI, 1.18-2.86), the amount of PEG ingested (OR 4.34; 95% CI, 1.08-16.66), and compliance with diet instructions (OR 2.22l 95% CI, 1.33-3.70) were significant contributors to satisfactory bowel preparation. Nonrandomized controlled, single-center trial. The optimal time interval between the last dose of the agent and the start of colonoscopy is one of the important factors to determine satisfactory bowel preparation quality in split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Lin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
尊敬寒松完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Ava应助lu采纳,获得10
2秒前
cmj发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
樱绫花雨完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
嘻嘻哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
张卉佳发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
爆米花应助zombie采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
科研混子发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
李健应助擎汉采纳,获得10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助怡然的老五采纳,获得10
6秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助侯MM采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
1525发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
英俊的铭应助zhongzihao采纳,获得10
8秒前
少喝奶茶完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
wxn发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
明亮听芹完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
震南发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
杨怡红完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
NEXUS1604完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
坦率白竹完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
lcr完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
小王子发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
过勇完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Tracy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
宁羽完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
晋绥日报合订本24册(影印本1986年)【1940年9月–1949年5月】 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6032705
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7722753
关于积分的说明 16201263
捐赠科研通 5179362
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2771782
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1755051
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1640057