Multifaceted risk for non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt in a population-based cohort of adults

队列 毒物控制 伤害预防 自杀预防 自杀未遂 临床心理学 人口 医学 自杀行为 精神科 自杀风险 人为因素与人体工程学 心理学 队列研究 职业安全与健康 医疗急救 内科学 环境卫生 病理
作者
Alexis C. Edwards,Amanda Elswick Gentry,Roseann E. Peterson,Bradley T. Webb,Eve K. Mościcki
出处
期刊:Journal of Affective Disorders [Elsevier]
卷期号:333: 474-481 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.040
摘要

Non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempt represent significant public health concerns. While these outcomes are related, there is prior evidence that their etiology does not entirely overlap. Efforts to directly differentiate risk across outcomes are uncommon, particularly among older, population-based cohorts.This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank. Data on individuals' self-reported history of non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt (maximum N = 6643) were analyzed. Applying LASSO and standard logistic regression, participants reporting one of these outcomes were assessed for differences across a range of sociodemographic, behavioral, and environmental features.Sociodemographic features most strongly differentiated between the outcomes of non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt. Specifically, Black individuals were more likely to report a suicide attempt, as were those of mixed race, those endorsing higher levels of depressive symptoms or trauma history, and those who had experienced financial problems (odds ratios 1.02-3.92). Those more likely to engage in non-suicidal self-injury only were younger, female, had higher levels of education, those who resided with a partner, and those who had a recently injured relative.Differences in timing across correlates and outcomes preclude the ability to establish causal pathways.The factors identified in the current study as differentially associated with non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt provide further evidence of at least partially distinct correlates, and warrant follow-up in independent samples to investigate causality.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
^O^发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
无极微光应助宇文远锋采纳,获得30
4秒前
6217发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
用头打碟发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
付付完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
笨笨的银耳汤完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
11秒前
MewZero发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
小马甲应助卡拉米人采纳,获得10
12秒前
友好从灵发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
乐乐应助^O^采纳,获得10
14秒前
www发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
000完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
干净的琦应助暴躁的灭绝采纳,获得10
16秒前
Judy发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
000关闭了000文献求助
17秒前
斗战圣牛完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
墨橙完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
22秒前
23秒前
24秒前
yyyyyxy完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
深情安青应助limbo采纳,获得10
25秒前
友好从灵完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Jasper应助木木采纳,获得10
27秒前
pluto应助shsf采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
王WW完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
ljq完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
ys716发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
缥缈千风完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6018383
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7606838
关于积分的说明 16159054
捐赠科研通 5166032
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765153
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746686
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635339