作者
Suzanne E. Schindler,Douglas Galasko,Ana C. Pereira,Gil D. Rabinovici,Stephen Salloway,Marc Suárez‐Calvet,Ara S. Khachaturian,Michelle M. Mielke,Chinedu Udeh‐Momoh,Joan Weiss,Richard Batrla,Sasha Bozeat,John Dwyer,Drew Holzapfel,Daryl Jones,James F. Murray,Katherine A. Partrick,Emily Scholler,George Vradenburg,Dylan Young,Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich,Jiri Aubrecht,Joel B. Braunstein,James A. Hendrix,Yan Hu,Soeren Mattke,Mark Monane,David Reilly,Elizabeth B. Somers,Charlotte E. Teunissen,Eli Shobin,Hugo Vanderstichele,Michael W. Weiner,David Wilson,Oskar Hansson
摘要
Anti-amyloid treatments for early symptomatic Alzheimer disease have recently become clinically available in some countries, which has greatly increased the need for biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology. Blood biomarker (BBM) tests for amyloid pathology are more acceptable, accessible and scalable than amyloid PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests, but have highly variable levels of performance. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to consider the minimum acceptable performance of BBM tests for clinical use. Amyloid PET status was identified as the reference standard. For use as a triaging test before subsequent confirmatory tests such as amyloid PET or CSF tests, the BBM Workgroup recommends that a BBM test has a sensitivity of ≥90% with a specificity of ≥85% in primary care and ≥75-85% in secondary care depending on the availability of follow-up testing. For use as a confirmatory test without follow-up tests, a BBM test should have performance equivalent to that of CSF tests - a sensitivity and specificity of ~90%. Importantly, the predictive values of all biomarker tests vary according to the pre-test probability of amyloid pathology and must be interpreted in the complete clinical context. Use of BBM tests that meet these performance standards could enable more people to receive an accurate and timely Alzheimer disease diagnosis and potentially benefit from new treatments.