社会哲学
社会学
操作化
社会工作
社会政策
经济正义
社会公正
意义(存在)
社会地位
社会心理学
社会关系
社会科学
法学
政治学
认识论
心理学
哲学
作者
Brittanie E Atteberry-Ash
出处
期刊:Social Work
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2022-11-02
卷期号:68 (1): 38-46
被引量:8
摘要
As a profession, social work has codified within its ethical guidance and educational policies a commitment to social justice. While a commitment to social justice is asserted in several of our profession's guiding documents, social work continues to lack consensus on both the meaning and merit of social justice, resulting is disparate and sometimes discriminatory practice even under a "social justice" label. This study examines how social justice has been operationalized in social work via a conceptual review of the literature. Findings show that social work leans heavily on John Rawls's definition of social justice, Martha Nussbaum's and Amartya Sen's capabilities approach, and the definition of social justice included in The Social Work Dictionary. Unfortunately, none of these adequately align with the National Association of Social Workers' Code of Ethics, which drives the profession. This conceptual review is a call to social workers to join together in defining the guiding principle of the profession.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI