Adverse events with EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 入射(几何) 内科学 不利影响 置信区间 胃肠病学 合并分析 支架 外科 物理 光学
作者
Suprabhat Giri,Babu P. Mohan,Vaneet Jearth,Aditya Kale,Sumaswi Angadi,Shivaraj Afzalpurkar,Sidharth Harindranath,Sridhar Sundaram
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:98 (4): 515-523.e18 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.055
摘要

Background and Aims Multiple meta-analyses have evaluated the technical and clinical success of EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD), but meta-analyses concerning adverse events (AEs) are limited. The present meta-analysis analyzed AEs associated with various types of EUS-BD. Methods A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted from 2005 to September 2022 for studies analyzing the outcome of EUS-BD. The primary outcomes were incidence of overall AEs, major AEs, procedure-related mortality, and reintervention. The event rates were pooled using a random-effects model. Results One hundred fifty-five studies (7887 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled clinical success rates and incidence of AEs with EUS-BD were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.1-95.9) and 13.7% (95% CI, 12.3-15.0), respectively. Among early AEs, bile leak was the most common followed by cholangitis with pooled incidences of 2.2% (95% CI, 1.8-2.7) and 1.0% (95% CI, .8-1.3), respectively. The pooled incidences of major AEs and procedure-related mortality with EUS-BD were .6% (95% CI, .3-.9) and .1% (95% CI, .0-.4), respectively. The pooled incidences of delayed migration and stent occlusion were 1.7% (95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and 11.0% (95% CI, 9.3-12.8), respectively. The pooled event rate for reintervention (for stent migration or occlusion) after EUS-BD was 16.2% (95% CI, 14.0-18.3; I2 = 77.5%). Conclusions Despite a high clinical success rate, EUS-BD may be associated with AEs in one-seventh of the cases. However, major AEs and mortality incidence remain less than 1%, which is reassuring. Multiple meta-analyses have evaluated the technical and clinical success of EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD), but meta-analyses concerning adverse events (AEs) are limited. The present meta-analysis analyzed AEs associated with various types of EUS-BD. A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted from 2005 to September 2022 for studies analyzing the outcome of EUS-BD. The primary outcomes were incidence of overall AEs, major AEs, procedure-related mortality, and reintervention. The event rates were pooled using a random-effects model. One hundred fifty-five studies (7887 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled clinical success rates and incidence of AEs with EUS-BD were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.1-95.9) and 13.7% (95% CI, 12.3-15.0), respectively. Among early AEs, bile leak was the most common followed by cholangitis with pooled incidences of 2.2% (95% CI, 1.8-2.7) and 1.0% (95% CI, .8-1.3), respectively. The pooled incidences of major AEs and procedure-related mortality with EUS-BD were .6% (95% CI, .3-.9) and .1% (95% CI, .0-.4), respectively. The pooled incidences of delayed migration and stent occlusion were 1.7% (95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and 11.0% (95% CI, 9.3-12.8), respectively. The pooled event rate for reintervention (for stent migration or occlusion) after EUS-BD was 16.2% (95% CI, 14.0-18.3; I2 = 77.5%). Despite a high clinical success rate, EUS-BD may be associated with AEs in one-seventh of the cases. However, major AEs and mortality incidence remain less than 1%, which is reassuring.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
睡到自然醒完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
cis2014完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
独特的大有完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
xingyi完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
舒心的秋荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
zz123发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
liaomr完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
粗犷的灵松完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
吃小孩的妖怪完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
ncuwzq完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
yshj完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
净禅完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
迷人的寒风完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
water应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
Lucas应助HHHAN采纳,获得10
29秒前
无情修杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
小柒完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
聪慧芷巧发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
34秒前
38秒前
蓝意完成签到,获得积分0
39秒前
xiaohongmao完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
47秒前
qweerrtt完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
54秒前
与共发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
carly完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
颢懿完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ljc完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Java完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022