医学
透明质酸
疤痕
回顾性队列研究
患者满意度
水肿
外科
皮肤病科
解剖
作者
Diane MacGillis,Yuri Vinshtok
摘要
Abstract Background Pneumatic‐assisted high velocity jet injections are an alternative method for intradermal delivery of hyaluronic acid (HA) and demonstrated efficacy in dermal thickening and scar remodeling with minimal side effects. Aims We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy comparing non‐crosslinked HA (NCL‐HA) and crosslinked HA (CL‐HA) for aesthetic skin concerns. Methods We retrospectively analyzed charts of 115 patients treated with jet injected NCL‐HA and CL‐HA for skin rejuvenation, age‐related laxity and rhytidosis, hypertrophic and acne scars and striae. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and the 5‐grade patient satisfaction scale were used for assessment of the treatment efficacy at the 3‐month follow‐up. Efficacy was separately analyzed between patients receiving NCL‐HA vs. CL‐HA. Longevity of treatment effect was measured by the time to voluntary return for repeat treatment. Results An average of 2.8 treatments was completed per patient with a low incidence of side effects including bruises (7%) and temporary local edema (1%). Patients were highly‐satisfied with the treatment results in all categories with the average satisfaction scores of 3.68 (NCL‐HA) and 3.76 (CL‐HA). An average GAIS score of 1.7 (“much improved”) was calculated for neck, décolleté and perioral areas. An overall GAIS score averaged as 1.78 (NCL‐HA) and 1.6 (CL‐HA). Longevity of the effect averaged 13.1 months for NCL‐HA and 13.2 months for CL‐HA groups. Conclusion Our retrospective data showed similar significant improvement of all aesthetic skin concerns in 115 subjects treated with either NCL‐HA or CL‐HA delivered intradermally by a high velocity jet‐injector device with minimal downtime, pain or side‐effects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI