倾向得分匹配
观察研究
匹配(统计)
计算机科学
质量(理念)
管理科学
数据科学
统计
数学
工程类
认识论
哲学
作者
Jeffrey Chen,David R. Maldonado,Brooke L. Kowalski,Kara B. Miecznikowski,Cynthia Kyin,Jeffrey Gornbein,Benjamin G. Domb
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy
[Elsevier]
日期:2022-02-01
卷期号:38 (2): 632-642
被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.037
摘要
Rigorous and reproducible methodology of controlling for bias is essential for high-quality, evidence-based studies. Propensity score matching (PSM) is a valuable way to control for bias and achieve pseudo-randomization in retrospective observation studies. The purpose of this review is to 1) provide a clear conceptual framework for PSM, 2) recommend how to best report its use in studies, and 3) offer some practical examples of implementation. First, this article covers the concepts behind PSM, discusses its pros and cons, and compares it with other methods of controlling for bias, namely, hard/exact matching and regression analysis. Second, recommendations are given for what to report in a manuscript when PSM is used. Finally, a worked example is provided, which can also serve as a template for the reader's own studies. A study's conclusions are only as strong as its methods. PSM is an invaluable tool for producing rigorous and reproducible results in observational studies. The goal of this article is to give practicing clinical physicians not only a better understanding of PSM and its implications but the ability to implement it for their own studies. STUDY DESIGN: Review.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI