医学
内科学
心房颤动
心脏病学
肺静脉
口
导管消融
气球
外科
阵发性心房颤动
窦性心律
烧蚀
无症状的
作者
Hai Xie,Xiaogang Guo,Jian‐Du Yang,Jiahui Li,Yanqiao Chen,Zhong-jing Cao,Qi Sun,Xiaoyao Li,Jun Ma
标识
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.683315
摘要
Background: Common ostium of inferior pulmonary veins (COIPV) is a kind of pulmonary vein variation. The safety and efficacy of COIPV isolation using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation remain unknown. Methods: A total of 10 patients with COIPV from a consecutive series of 1,751 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed using the second-generation CB. Results: The prevalence of a COIPV was 0.57% in this study. PVI was achieved in all pulmonary veins (PVs) without the need for a touch-up. A segmental freeze strategy was applied for each inferior PV, respectively. The mean number of freeze cycles of inferior PVs was 1.4 ± 0.5 for the left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), and 2.0 ± 0.9 for the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV). Pulmonary vein potential (PVP) of RIPV could not be monitored in real-time in three cases. Eight of 10 patients (80%) were free from atrial arrhythmias without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs during a follow-up period of 23.6 ± 12.9 months. No procedure-related complications occurred in any of the 10 patients. Conclusions: Common ostium of inferior pulmonary veins is a rare but challenging PV variant. PVI with this unusual anatomic variation using the second-generation 28-mm CB is effective and safe.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI