期限(时间)
结果(博弈论)
医学
生活质量(医疗保健)
重症监护医学
普通外科
外科
物理
经济
护理部
量子力学
数理经济学
作者
Cara Baker,Matthew Forshaw,James Gossage,R. Ng,Robert C. Mason
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.004
摘要
Abstract Background The consequences of major conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy are devastating. Jejunal interposition with vascular supercharging is an alternative reconstructive method if colon is unavailable. Aims of this study were to review the long-term outcome and quality of life of patients undergoing this surgery in our tertiary unit. Methods Patients undergoing oesophageal reconstruction with supercharged jejunum were identified and retrospective review of hospital notes performed. Each patient was then interviewed for follow up data and quality of life assessment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results Six patients (5 men) (median age 59 years (range 34–72) underwent supercharged pedicled jejunal (SPJ) interposition from May 2005–August 2010. Indications for surgery were loss of both gastric and colonic conduits following surgery for oesophageal cancer ( n = 4), loss of gastric conduit and previous colectomy ( n = 1) and lastly, gastric and colonic infarction in a strangulated paraoesophageal hernia ( n = 1). Median time to reconstruction was 12 months [6–15 range]. There were no in-hospital deaths. Median postoperative stay was 46 days [13–118]. Three patients required surgical re-intervention for leak, sepsis and reflux, respectively. Median follow up was 6.5 years [range 7–102 months]. One patient died seven months following surgery due to respiratory complications. On follow up, 5 patients have an enteral diet without supplemental nutrition, maintaining weight and good quality of life scores. Conclusions Supercharged jejunal interposition is a suitable alternative conduit for delayed oesophageal replacement in patients with otherwise limited reconstructive options. Good functional outcomes can be achieved despite formidable technical challenges in this group.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI