好奇心
风险补偿
毒物控制
激励
适应(眼睛)
价值(数学)
风险分析(工程)
补偿(心理学)
实证经济学
SPARK(编程语言)
心理学
计算机科学
社会心理学
医学
环境卫生
经济
微观经济学
神经科学
程序设计语言
家庭医学
机器学习
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)
出处
期刊:Safety Science
[Elsevier]
日期:1996-02-01
卷期号:22 (1-3): 119-130
被引量:50
标识
DOI:10.1016/0925-7535(96)00010-0
摘要
Risk homeostasis theory (RHT) has sparked continuous scientific debate for more than a decade. Beginning with total rejection, it was then increasingly examined with doubtful curiosity. In the following years it received some support, until there is now universal acceptance of one of its key components, namely risk compensation or behavioural adaptation. The strict notion of risk homeostasis, however, is still open for debate, as some of its problems, both theoretical and empirical, have not been sufficiently resolved. For example, falsifying the concept seems to be impossible in field studies, as not all possible behavioural adaptations can be controlled for. Yet, while some aspects need to be clarified, RHT continues to spark interesting research and to provide useful ideas for accident reduction and preventing health-related dangers, such as the focusing on incentives. Including the notion of risk-taking behaviour as being sometimes attractive and changing the notion of a single to that of multiple target levels of risk are among suggestions for theoretical development. Using participative methods to change both risk assessment and the value of safety and health are suggestions for further applications of RHT made in this paper.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI