Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review

心理学 认知偏差 梅德林 临床决策 临床判断 应用心理学 认知心理学 认知 社会心理学 医学 精神科 政治学 医学物理学 重症监护医学 法学
作者
Lorraine M. Thirsk,Julia T. Panchuk,Sarah Wall,Reidar Hagtvedt
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier]
卷期号:133: 104284-104284 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104284
摘要

Cognitive and implicit biases of healthcare providers can lead to adverse events in healthcare and have been identified as a patient safety concern. Most research on the impact of these systematic errors in judgment has been focused on diagnostic decision-making, primarily by physicians. As the largest component of the workforce, nurses make numerous decisions that affect patient outcomes; however, literature on nurses' clinical judgment often overlooks the potential impact of bias on these decisions. The aim of this study was to map the evidence and key concepts related to bias in nurses' judgment and decision-making, including interventions to correct or overcome these biases. We conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs methodology. In November 2020 we searched CINAHL, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases to identify relevant literature. Inclusion criteria were primary research about nurses' bias; evidence of a nursing decision or action; and English language. No date or geographic limitations were set. We found 77 items that met the inclusion criteria. Over half of these items were published in the last 12 years. Most research focused on implicit biases related to racial/ethnic identity, obesity, and gender; other articles examined confirmation, attribution, anchoring, and hindsight biases. Some articles examined heuristics and were included if they described the process of, and the problems with, nurse decision-making. Only 5 studies tested interventions to overcome or correct biases. 61 of the studies relied on vignettes, surveys, or recall methods, rather than examining real-world nursing practice. This could be a serious oversight because contextual factors such as cognitive load, which have a significant impact on judgment and decision-making, are not necessarily captured with vignette or survey studies. Furthermore, survey and vignette studies make it difficult to quantify the impact of these biases in the healthcare system. Given the serious effects that bias has on nurses' clinical judgment, and thereby patient outcomes, a concerted, systematic effort to identify and test debiasing strategies in real-world nursing settings is needed. Bias affects nurses' clinical judgment – we need to know how to fix it.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小滨发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Elaine完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
jiaozhuoi完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
充电宝应助迅速冰颜采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
你好啊发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
LC发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
白华苍松发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
山水木发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
rafa完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
公孙世往发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
优秀紫菜完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
光亮的莆完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Adeline发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
188的浩完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
小二郎应助李小汁采纳,获得10
23秒前
25秒前
电磁很快学会应助Linyi采纳,获得10
25秒前
小蘑菇应助公孙世往采纳,获得10
26秒前
鲸落完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
Cheney完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
尽如完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
李小汁发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
dnmd完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
外向半青完成签到,获得积分20
37秒前
liu95完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
LC完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
壮壮女士完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
50秒前
50秒前
BBQ完成签到,获得积分20
52秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Handbook of Qualitative Cross-Cultural Research Methods 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137575
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2788520
关于积分的说明 7787428
捐赠科研通 2444861
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1300110
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625813
版权声明 601023