Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006)

易普利姆玛 医学 彭布罗利珠单抗 打开标签 内科学 肿瘤科 开放标签研究 癌症 临床试验 不利影响 免疫疗法
作者
Jacob Schachter,Antoni Ribas,Georgina V. Long,Ana Arance,Jean‐Jacques Grob,Laurent Mortier,Adil Daud,Matteo S. Carlino,Catriona M. McNeil,Michal Lotem,James Larkin,Paul Lorigan,Bart Neyns,Christian U. Blank,Teresa M. Petrella,Omid Hamid,Haiyu Zhou,Scot Ebbinghaus,Nageatte Ibrahim,Caroline Robert
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:390 (10105): 1853-1862 被引量:1117
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31601-x
摘要

Summary

Background

Interim analyses of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-006 study showed superior overall and progression-free survival of pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. We present the final protocol-specified survival analysis.

Methods

In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients from 87 academic institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 16 countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, France, Germany, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, UK, and USA). We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1) to one of two dose regimens of pembrolizumab, or one regimen of ipilimumab, using a centralised, computer-generated allocation schedule. Treatment assignments used blocked randomisation within strata. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), unresectable stage III or IV melanoma (excluding ocular melanoma), and up to one previous systemic therapy (excluding anti-CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1 agents). Secondary eligibility criteria are described later. Patients were excluded if they had active brain metastases or active autoimmune disease requiring systemic steroids. The primary outcome was overall survival (defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause). Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review at week 12, then every 6 weeks up to week 48, and then every 12 weeks thereafter. Survival was assessed every 12 weeks, and final analysis occurred after all patients were followed up for at least 21 months. Primary analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients) and safety analyses were done in the treated population (all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). Data cutoff date for this analysis was Dec 3, 2015. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01866319.

Findings

Between Sept 18, 2013, and March 3, 2014, 834 patients with advanced melanoma were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive intravenous pembrolizumab every 2 weeks (n=279), intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (n=277), or intravenous ipilimumab every 3 weeks (ipilimumab for four doses; n=278). One patient in the pembrolizumab 2 week group and 22 patients in the ipilimumab group withdrew consent and did not receive treatment. A total of 811 patients received at least one dose of study treatment. Median follow-up was 22·9 months; 383 patients died. Median overall survival was not reached in either pembrolizumab group and was 16·0 months with ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·53–0·87 for pembrolizumab every 2 weeks vs ipilimumab; p=0·0009 and 0·68, 0·53–0·86 for pembrolizumab every 3 weeks vs ipilimumab; p=0·0008). 24-month overall survival rate was 55% in the 2-week group, 55% in the 3-week group, and 43% in the ipilimumab group.

Interpretation

Substantiating the results of the interim analyses of KEYNOTE-006, pembrolizumab continued to provide superior overall survival versus ipilimumab, with no difference between pembrolizumab dosing schedules. These conclusions further support the use of pembrolizumab as a standard of care for advanced melanoma.

Funding

Merck & Co.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
十二卫发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
斯文的寒风应助ttt采纳,获得10
3秒前
雪梨101完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
yo一天完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
可爱的函函应助球球采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
善学以致用应助天佑小涛采纳,获得10
6秒前
酒石酸发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
奔波儿灞发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
阳光不弱发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
yidong发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
蒙塔啦完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
时遇完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
paulbarnabas完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
蒙塔啦发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
愿我可完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
1L聚合釜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Tom47发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Chloe完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Ava应助shinn采纳,获得10
13秒前
NN应助dengdengdeng采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
愿我可发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
天佑小涛完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
硕小牛完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
斯文败类应助科研八戒采纳,获得10
17秒前
喃喃发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
xmy完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
斯文败类应助蛋白素肉采纳,获得10
19秒前
天佑小涛发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
球球发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Musculoskeletal Pain - Market Insight, Epidemiology And Market Forecast - 2034 2000
Animal Physiology 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3745215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3288176
关于积分的说明 10057633
捐赠科研通 3004408
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1649653
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 785467
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 751085