亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation for chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a Finnish, nationwide, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

医学 硬膜下间隙 外科 随机对照试验 神经外科 改良兰金量表 排水 血肿 生态学 生物 心脏病学 缺血 缺血性中风
作者
Rahul Raj,Pihla Tommiska,Timo Koivisto,Ville Leinonen,Nils Danner,Jussi P. Posti,Dan Laukka,Teemu M. Luoto,Minna Rauhala,Sami Tetri,Tommi K. Korhonen,Jarno Satopää,Riku Kivisaari,Teemu Luostarinen,Christoph Schwartz,Tomasz Czuba,Simo Taimela,Kimmo Lönnrot,Teppo L. N. Järvinen,Abdirisak Ahmed
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:403 (10446): 2798-2806 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00686-x
摘要

Background Chronic subdural haematoma is a common surgically treated intracranial emergency. Burr-hole drainage surgery, to evacuate chronic subdural haematoma, involves three elements: creation of a burr hole for access, irrigation of the subdural space, and insertion of a subdural drain. Although the subdural drain has been established as beneficial, the therapeutic effect of subdural irrigation has not been addressed. Methods The FINISH trial was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, nationwide, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in five neurosurgical units in Finland that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with a chronic subdural haematoma requiring burr-hole drainage. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation with block sizes of four, six, or eight, stratified by site, to burr-hole drainage either with or without subdural irrigation. All patients and staff were masked to treatment assignment apart from the neurosurgeon and operating room staff. A burr hole was drilled at the site of maximum haematoma thickness in both groups, and the subdural space was either irrigated or not irrigated before inserting a subdural drain, which remained in place for 48 h. Reoperations, functional outcome, mortality, and adverse events were recorded for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate within 6 months. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7·5%. Key secondary outcomes that were also required to conclude non-inferiority were the proportion of participants with unfavourable functional outcomes (ie, modified Rankin Scale score of 4–6, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 6 indicates death) and mortality rate at 6 months. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04203550) and is completed. Findings From Jan 1, 2020, to Aug 17, 2022, we assessed 1644 patients for eligibility and 589 (36%) patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and treated (294 assigned to drainage with irrigation and 295 assigned to drainage without irrigation; 165 [28%] women and 424 [72%] men). The 6-month follow-up period extended until Feb 14, 2023. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 54 (18·3%) of 295 participants required reoperation in the group assigned to receive no irrigation versus 37 (12·6%) of 294 in the group assigned to receive irrigation (difference of 6·0 percentage points, 95% CI 0·2–11·7; p=0·30; adjusted for study site). There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of people with modified Rankin Scale score of 4–6 (37 [13·1%] of 283 in the no-irrigation group vs 36 [12·6%] of 285 in the irrigation group; p=0·89) or mortality rate (18 [6·1%] of 295 in the no-irrigation group vs 21 [7·1%] of 294 in the irrigation group; p=0·58). The findings of the primary intention-to-treat analysis were not materially altered in the per-protocol analysis. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of adverse events, and the most frequent severe adverse events were systemic infections (26 [8·8%] of 295 participants who did not receive irrigation vs 22 [7·5%] of 294 participants who received irrigation), intracranial haemorrhage (13 [4·4%] vs seven [2·4%]), and epileptic seizures (five [1·7%] vs nine [3·1%]). Interpretation We could not conclude non-inferiority of burr-hole drainage without irrigation. The reoperation rate was 6·0 percentage points higher after burr-hole drainage without subdural irrigation than with subdural irrigation. Considering that there were no differences in functional outcome or mortality between the groups, the trial favours the use of subdural irrigation. Funding State Fund for University Level Health Research (Helsinki University Hospital), Finska Läkaresällskapet, Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa, and Svenska Kulturfonden.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
激情的怀薇完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
aichifan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Caroline完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
汉堡包应助风中的半雪采纳,获得10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
科研通AI5应助aichifan采纳,获得10
8秒前
Grayball应助Jlu采纳,获得10
10秒前
完美无敌发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
美丽跳跳糖完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
晓书完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
31秒前
DD立芬完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
zl完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
40秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
45秒前
小胡爱科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
ovo发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
若尘完成签到 ,获得积分20
53秒前
追寻善斓完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
九日橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
FashionBoy应助刻苦的源智采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
从容芮应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
打打应助772829采纳,获得30
1分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3660936
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222150
关于积分的说明 9743644
捐赠科研通 2931648
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605151
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757705
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734462