Validation of a risk score to differentiate autoimmune and viral encephalitis: a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

医学 队列 自身免疫性脑炎 接收机工作特性 脑炎 内科学 队列研究 病因学 回顾性队列研究 曲线下面积 人口 儿科 免疫学 病毒 环境卫生
作者
Lasse Fjordside,Mette Scheller Nissen,Anna Maria Florescu,Merete Storgaard,Lykke Larsen,Lothar Wiese,Hans R. Lüttichau,Micha Phill Grønholm Jepsen,Birgitte Rønde Hansen,Christian Østergaard Andersen,Jacob Bodilsen,Henrik Nielsen,Morten Blaabjerg,Anne‐Mette Lebech,Helene Mens
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Nature]
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12392-3
摘要

Abstract Background A score to differentiate autoimmune (AE) and viral encephalitis (VE) early upon admission has recently been developed but needed external validation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the score in a larger and more diagnostically diverse patient cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective nationwide and population-based cohort study including all adults with encephalitis of definite viral (2015–2022) or autoimmune aetiology (2009–2022) in Denmark. Variables included in the score-model were extracted from patient records and individual risk scores were assessed. The performance of the score was assessed by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses and calculation of the area under the curve (AUC). Results A total of 496 patients with encephalitis [AE n = 90, VE n = 287 and presumed infectious encephalitis (PIE) n = 119] were included in the study. The score was highly accurate in predicting cases of AE reaching an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92–0.97). Having a score ≥ 3 predicted AE with a PPV of 87% and an NPV of 91%. The risk score was found to perform well across aetiological subgroups and applied to the PIE cohort resulted in an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.93). Conclusion The excellent performance of the score as reported in the development study was confirmed in this significantly larger and more diverse cohort of patients with encephalitis in Denmark. These results should prompt further prospective testing with wider inclusion criteria.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
barry发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
萧程发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
万幸鹿发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
yxy发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
2秒前
FangLL完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
hhhhhhh发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
2秒前
可爱的函函应助SZY采纳,获得10
2秒前
大胆班完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
邱穗发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
六六发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Hello应助aabbfz采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助syx采纳,获得10
4秒前
wanci应助Jayee采纳,获得10
4秒前
Cyrus完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
xiangsi完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
wenyudi发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Akim应助T拐拐采纳,获得10
5秒前
辛沫儿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
近代发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
仁爱的松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Zoom完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
iwooto发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
陈星发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
柯尔道南完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
ding应助曾哥帅采纳,获得10
9秒前
现实的云朵完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
The Complete Pro-Guide to the All-New Affinity Studio: The A-to-Z Master Manual: Master Vector, Pixel, & Layout Design: Advanced Techniques for Photo, Designer, and Publisher in the Unified Suite 1000
按地区划分的1,091个公共养老金档案列表 801
The International Law of the Sea (fourth edition) 800
Machine Learning for Polymer Informatics 500
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5410082
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4527588
关于积分的说明 14111576
捐赠科研通 4441954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2437768
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1429705
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1407763