Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Based Contrast Media Adaptation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Personalized Triphasic Injection Protocols: A Matched Case-Control Study

Rationale and Objectives Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first-line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure are of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration Material and Methods Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130 kV with a 10 kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups. Results The final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120 kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0–52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1–73.0] mL, p < 0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p = 0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3–5] vs. 4 [3–5], p = 0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p > 0.05). Conclusion ATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first-line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure are of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130 kV with a 10 kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups. The final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120 kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0–52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1–73.0] mL, p < 0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p = 0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3–5] vs. 4 [3–5], p = 0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p > 0.05). ATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality.