Navigating the complexities of docking tools with nicotinic receptors and acetylcholine binding proteins in the realm of neonicotinoids

Molecular docking, pivotal in predicting small-molecule ligand binding modes, struggles with accurately identifying binding conformations and affinities. This is particularly true for neonicotinoids, insecticides whose impacts on ecosystems require precise molecular interaction modeling. This study scrutinizes the effectiveness of prominent docking software (Ledock, ADFR, Autodock Vina, CDOCKER) in simulating interactions of environmental chemicals, especially neonicotinoid-like molecules with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and acetylcholine binding proteins (AChBPs). We aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of these tools in reproducing crystallographic data, focusing on semi-flexible and flexible docking approaches. Our analysis identified Ledock as the most accurate in semi-flexible docking, while Autodock Vina with Vinardo scoring function proved most reliable. However, no software consistently excelled in both accuracy and reliability. Additionally, our evaluation revealed that none of the tools could establish a clear correlation between docking scores and experimental dissociation constants (K