Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors that inform systemic antifungal choices in patients with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE).

DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective case series.

METHODS

Charts of EFE patients from 2010 to 2023 were reviewed. Patients treated systemically for EFE with a minimum of 14 days of follow-up were included. Outcome measures included time to improvement in vitritis or chorioretinitis, systemic therapy modification, and need for surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 20 eyes of 16 patients were included. Candida species were most common (43.8%), followed by culture-negative EFE (37.5%) and Aspergillus species (18.8%). In all, 90% of eyes had vitritis and/or macula-involving chorioretinitis. The majority of Candida infections (60%) or culture-negative EFE (75%) were treated initially with oral antifungals. Patients with a history of immune compromise, positive fungal culture, or positive Fungitell assay were more likely to be treated with early intravenous (IV) antifungal therapy. Two patients required systemic antifungal therapy modification because of worsening chorioretinitis, in 1 case due to voriconazole-resistant Aspergillosis that demonstrated chorioretinal lesion growth despite intravitreal amphotericin B injections and systemic voriconazole, and in the second case due to worsening chorioretinitis from Candida dubliniensis infection that regressed upon switch from oral to IV fluconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial systemic treatment decisions in patients with EFE were driven by systemic culture positivity, systemic symptoms, or comorbidities. Intravitreal antifungal therapy may be insufficient to arrest progression of chorioretinal lesions in some cases. Larger studies are needed to determine whether visible end-organ damage in the form of chorioretinitis may be useful for guiding systemic therapy changes.