Self-Advocacy During the Medical Encounter

置信区间 民族 医学 家庭医学 优势比 可能性 二项回归 逻辑回归 人口学 健康信息全国趋势调查 健康信息 药方 卫生公平 公共卫生 医疗保健 护理部 病理 社会学 内科学 经济增长 经济 人类学
作者
Jacqueline Wiltshire,Kate Cronin,Gloria E. Sarto,Roger Brown
出处
期刊:Medical Care [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:44 (2): 100-109 被引量:84
标识
DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000196975.52557.b7
摘要

Research indicates that patients who self-advocate during the medical encounter gain maximum benefit. However, little is known about racial/ethnic differences in self-advocacy.We sought to examine whether race/ethnicity and obtaining health information are associated with self-advocacy (mentioned health information to physician and physician ordered tests based on health information).Study data were drawn from the 2000-2001 Household Component of the Community Tracking Study, a nationally representative survey. The study sample included 7419 women ages 45 to 64 who had at least 1 physician visit in the previous year. Binomial logit models were used to assess self-advocacy. Probability adjustments were applied to results.In the full sample (n = 7419), women who obtained health information were almost 5 times more likely to mention that information to their physician (odds ration [OR] = 4.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.05-5.60) than women who did not obtain information. Black women were less likely to mention health information to their physician (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.37-0.73) than white women. Among women who obtained health information (n = 3690), black women also were less likely to mention health information to their physician (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.83) than white women. Among those who mentioned health information to the physician, Hispanic women were more likely than white women to have a test/procedure/prescription prescribed (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.10-4.20). However, after adjusting probability, this difference was not statistically significant.Although health information was associated with self-advocacy, black women were less likely to self-advocate. Further research is needed to better understand factors that impede black women from self-advocating.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
SCI完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
dakeai233333完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
威武白凝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
吴磊完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
平凡的一天完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
体贴的之卉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
626完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
饿哭了塞发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
华仔应助冷静妙之采纳,获得20
7秒前
NONO发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
食梦貊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
sunflower发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
hi应助626采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
神明发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
蓝色牛马发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
走进你的梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
不安雪一发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
dingby发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
dong完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
走啊走啊走完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
chocolate完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
lybae发布了新的文献求助50
23秒前
23秒前
乐乐应助zyc采纳,获得10
24秒前
手可摘星辰完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5712999
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5213045
关于积分的说明 15269140
捐赠科研通 4864791
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2611645
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1561939
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1519153