医学
达比加群
拜瑞妥
心房颤动
内科学
冲程(发动机)
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
低风险
科克伦图书馆
置信区间
依杜沙班
阿哌沙班
优势比
相对风险
华法林
工程类
机械工程
作者
Meina Lv,Tingting Wu,Shaojun Jiang,Wenjun Chen,Jinhua Zhang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.011
摘要
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who take direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) face the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), which can be serious and even life threatening, but the risk of ICH of anticoagulants is still controversial. In this meta-analysis, we compared the risk of ICH between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and DOACs. Furthermore, we also compared the risk of ICH in different DOACs. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The outcome was ICH, shown as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). DOACs were ranked by calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We included a total of 82,404 patients with AF. DOACs reduced the ICH risk by nearly half compared with VKAs (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.54, p <0.001). VKAs were the least safe among all oral anticoagulants (SUCRA 1.7). Dabigatran 110 mg was the safest DOAC (SUCRA 87.3) for ICH risk, whereas rivaroxaban 20 mg was a relatively unsafe DOAC (SUCRA 27.5). Compared with rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 110 mg presented 53% (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.82) lower relative risk for ICH. In conclusion, DOACs present less ICH risk than VKAs in patients with AF. For patients with AF who are at high risk of ICH, dabigatran 110 mg may be the safest choice among the DOACs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI