已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 粒细胞集落刺激因子
作者
Stephanie A. Gregory,May Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee S. Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:114 (22): 4561-4561 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
leileiz123应助金鑫采纳,获得10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
笨笨蜻蜓完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
动听的又亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
陈欣瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
哎健身完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
帅气满天完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
14秒前
14秒前
shiningsun31发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
稳重的冥王星完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
舒适代丝完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
24秒前
认真的白易完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
无私吐司发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
活力的啤酒完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
耍酷乘云发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
垃笔小心发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
高分求助中
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 500
A revision of Limenitis helmanni and its related species (Nymphalidae) from Central and South China 400
Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy 10th Edition 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Mechanical Support: Principles and Practice, Fifth Edition 400
Circular Polar Constellations Providing Continuous Single or Multiple Coverage Above a Specified Latitude 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6775987
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8499685
关于积分的说明 18108878
捐赠科研通 6073038
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3016391
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1993408
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1974591