Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 中性粒细胞减少症
作者
Stephanie A. Gregory,May Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee S. Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
黄紫红蓝发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
anna1992发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
cquank发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
SYLH应助dongli6536采纳,获得10
3秒前
water完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
上官若男应助shine采纳,获得10
4秒前
战战兢兢完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Shinewei完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
开心蘑菇应助自由的无色采纳,获得30
5秒前
fff完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
小鱼医生发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
jyu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
xiejinhui发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
kiki完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
铁甲小宝发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Shinewei发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
久9完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
cquank完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
ZoraZeng完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
虚心的寒梦完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
炫哥IRIS完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
牧童完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
HenryXiao发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
顺利紫山发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
ZZRR完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
英姑应助耶耶耶耶耶采纳,获得10
15秒前
渝儿发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
可靠薯片完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, 2nd Edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3987078
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529488
关于积分的说明 11245360
捐赠科研通 3267987
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804013
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881270
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808650