Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 粒细胞集落刺激因子
作者
Stephanie A. Gregory,May Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee S. Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:114 (22): 4561-4561 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
汉堡发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
Pikaluo完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
jcd完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
舒昀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
淘气宇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
鳗鱼怡完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
东方天奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
斯文含双应助天天天才采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
LLSSLL完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
hi_traffic发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助单纯若采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
醉熏的忆雪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
Akim应助淘气宇采纳,获得10
9秒前
Ava应助蜘蛛人采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
乐乐应助ZungJyu采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
桃子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小虚心完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
汉堡包应助欣喜寄云采纳,获得10
12秒前
无奈妖妖完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
符昱发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
黎敏完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
zzx发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Guo发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小虚心发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
zzzz应助LLSSLL采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1500
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
Rheumatoid arthritis drugs market analysis North America, Europe, Asia, Rest of world (ROW)-US, UK, Germany, France, China-size and Forecast 2024-2028 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6366041
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8179983
关于积分的说明 17243873
捐赠科研通 5420779
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2868231
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1845373
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1692871