Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 粒细胞集落刺激因子
作者
Stephanie A. Gregory,May Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee S. Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [American Society of Hematology]
卷期号:114 (22): 4561-4561 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
donnolea完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
Akim应助cookie采纳,获得10
1秒前
CASLSD完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
LKX完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
白小超人发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小只完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
丘比特应助英雄睿睿采纳,获得20
1秒前
AirJia完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
JamesPei应助陈曦读研版采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
West Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
李xue发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
倩Q发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
嘻嘻哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wdl完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
任性的傲柏完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
烟花应助佳语妍说采纳,获得10
5秒前
Aurora完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
dhf发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
星辰大海应助安静季节采纳,获得10
6秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
小乔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
回穆完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
Jasper发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
7秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
7秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs 2000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
Building Quantum Computers 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
二氧化碳加氢催化剂——结构设计与反应机制研究 660
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5659263
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4828262
关于积分的说明 15086235
捐赠科研通 4817957
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2578418
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1533076
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1491767