亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 中性粒细胞减少症
作者
Stephanie A. Gregory,May Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee S. Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [American Society of Hematology]
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
陶醉的烤鸡完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
蓝白啦发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
狐狸萌萌哒完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
13秒前
jane应助Fzx2664242918采纳,获得10
13秒前
16秒前
杜青发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
Fzx2664242918完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
杜青完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
47秒前
qian完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
48秒前
qian发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
53秒前
星辰大海应助qian采纳,获得10
57秒前
Enns完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
暖暖发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
深情映冬发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Mong那粒沙发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
暖暖完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
深情映冬完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
可爱的大白菜真实的钥匙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Jox发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Xiaoxiao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
大冬瓜发布了新的文献求助50
2分钟前
2分钟前
Hello应助Mong那粒沙采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
jyy应助Jox采纳,获得10
2分钟前
慕青应助Jox采纳,获得10
2分钟前
rofsc完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
能干的语芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Owen应助Gab_bb采纳,获得10
3分钟前
毓雅完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Hungrylunch应助keo采纳,获得50
3分钟前
3分钟前
hwen1998完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 720
電気学会論文誌D(産業応用部門誌), 141 巻, 11 号 510
Typology of Conditional Constructions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3566592
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3139312
关于积分的说明 9431510
捐赠科研通 2840151
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1560959
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 730103
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 717828