Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 内科学 抗生素 相对风险 随机对照试验 比率 置信区间 布鲁氏菌病 队列 免疫学 微生物学 生物
作者
Shenghui Huang,Hao Wang,Fande Li,Du Li,Wei Fan,Meifang Zhao,Zhen Hua,Yuke Yan,Menghan Lu,Xiaozhe Han,Zhuo Li,Mujinyan Li,Shuqi An,Xinyao Zhang,Qing Zhen,Tiejun Shui
出处
期刊:PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases [Public Library of Science]
卷期号:17 (9): e0011590-e0011590 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590
摘要

Background The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. Results The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I 2 = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I 2 = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I 2 = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I 2 = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. Conclusions In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zishan发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
lllyf发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
侧耳倾听发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
寒冷的寒梦完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
蕾蕾完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zzmyyds发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
asqw完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
YMH发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zzer发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
tang123完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
3d54s2完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小青椒应助潇洒的依凝采纳,获得30
4秒前
李海翔完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
99giddens发布了新的文献求助100
7秒前
7秒前
烤肠应助闪闪的熠彤采纳,获得20
7秒前
崔win完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
lzl完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
Zx_1993应助小星星采纳,获得20
9秒前
FashionBoy应助huizi采纳,获得10
9秒前
无花果应助123采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
lili发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI6应助齐齐采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
LJY完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
激情的羊青完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
马汉仓发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
酷炫千凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
子车茗应助ash采纳,获得30
14秒前
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1581
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 1500
Specialist Periodical Reports - Organometallic Chemistry Organometallic Chemistry: Volume 46 1000
Current Trends in Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery (CTD4-2022) 800
The Scope of Slavic Aspect 600
Foregrounding Marking Shift in Sundanese Written Narrative Segments 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5531988
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4620728
关于积分的说明 14574699
捐赠科研通 4560496
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2498874
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1478787
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1450096