Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 内科学 抗生素 相对风险 随机对照试验 比率 置信区间 布鲁氏菌病 队列 免疫学 微生物学 生物
作者
Shenghui Huang,Hao Wang,Fande Li,Du Li,Wei Fan,Meifang Zhao,Zhen Hua,Yuke Yan,Menghan Lu,Xiaozhe Han,Zhuo Li,Mujinyan Li,Shuqi An,Xinyao Zhang,Qing Zhen,Tiejun Shui
出处
期刊:PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases [Public Library of Science]
卷期号:17 (9): e0011590-e0011590 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590
摘要

Background The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. Results The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I 2 = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I 2 = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I 2 = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I 2 = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. Conclusions In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助kkPi采纳,获得10
刚刚
紫丁香完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
四叶草哦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
机智乐蕊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
故事细腻完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Zzy0816完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
棉花完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
无极微光应助学术牛马采纳,获得20
4秒前
5秒前
nanjiab发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
山雀完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
任炳成完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
Rowan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
kkkkpoa完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
善良水池完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
Lucy发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
完美世界应助bbbjddd采纳,获得10
10秒前
忧伤的映阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
zbaby发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Ava应助笑点低的静竹采纳,获得10
12秒前
Orange应助坚强的访蕊采纳,获得10
13秒前
受伤毛豆完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
酷波er应助私欲宝宝采纳,获得10
13秒前
后知后觉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
DD发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
林淼完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
李健的小迷弟应助归诚采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
Cker完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5600957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4686530
关于积分的说明 14844417
捐赠科研通 4679086
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2539100
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505992
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471252