纳特
窗口期
病毒学
丙型肝炎病毒
效价
献血者
基因分型
医学
剩余风险
丙型肝炎
核酸检测
基因型
病毒
免疫学
抗体
生物
内科学
血清学
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
遗传学
传染病(医学专业)
疾病
计算机科学
计算机网络
基因
作者
Kiyoshi Himmelsbach,Susanne Mueller,Julia Kreß,Sarah Anna Fiedler,Csaba Miskey,Zoltán Ivics,A. Patek,Michael Chudy
出处
期刊:Transfusion
[Wiley]
日期:2022-12-14
卷期号:63 (2): 339-347
被引量:7
摘要
Abstract Background Viral safety of blood products in Germany has improved significantly over the last two decades. We describe the second documented transfusion‐transmitted (TT) episode for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Germany since mandatory nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) screening was introduced in 1999. Study Design and Methods When a repeat donor who had tested negative for anti‐HCV tested positive for HCV RNA by NAT in a minipool (MP) of eight, a look‐back procedure was initiated. Qualitative, quantitative and genotyping assays were used to investigate the titers of the quarantined fresh frozen plasma (FFP) from the donor and a serum sample from the recipient of the pooled platelet concentrate (PPC). Amplified products of 5'UTR and HVR1 were used for sequence comparison to characterize the HCV genomic identity of donor and recipient samples. Results All NAT tests utilized in this procedure were able to detect a low HCV RNA titer (~15 IU/ml) in the FFP from the donation. Dilution of FFP by factor 8 was performed to mimic an MP, and the detection rate correlated well with the claimed sensitivity of the tests. Analysis of donor and recipient samples revealed genotype 3a viral transmission confirmed by sequence analysis. Conclusion This TT HCV case could have been prevented by individual donation (ID) NAT. However, a low titer blood donation in the window period (WP) is very rare. Residual risk calculation for TT HCV in the WP revealed that, compared to MP‐NAT testing, ID‐NAT would improve blood safety only marginally.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI