A Prospective Trial Demonstrating the Benefit of Personalized Selection Of Breath-Hold Technique for Upper-Abdominal Radiation Therapy Using the Active Breathing Coordinator

医学 呼吸 前瞻性队列研究 放射治疗 腹部 核医学 放射科 内科学 解剖
作者
Briana Farrugia,Kellie Knight,Caroline Wright,Mark Tacey,Farshad Foroudi,Michael Chao,Richard Khor
出处
期刊:International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:111 (5): 1289-1297 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.001
摘要

For upper abdominal tumors, our institutional-standard motion reduction method is the expiration breath-hold (EBH) technique, using Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC). However, an individual patient's breath-hold (BH) reproducibility (RBH) may be improved in deep inspiration or inspiration breath-hold (DIBH or IBH). This trial compared the tumor position RBH, stability (SBH), and breath-hold time (TBH) of 3 BH methods, using ABC, to personalize the selection of technique, by using a preplanning screening assessment.We invited patients planned for upper abdominal radiation therapy (kidney, pancreas, liver, or adrenal gland) to participate in this prospective trial. We conducted ABC education with the study participants, who then attempted EBH, DIBH, and IBH in randomized order. During 5 consecutive BH's for each method, we acquire kV fluoroscopy images of the diaphragm. We personalized the BH technique selection according to a decision matrix. We analyzed the EBH and the personalized technique cohort mean RBH and SBH.Between May 2019 and March 2020, we recruited 19 participants. Median age of participants was 68 years (range 32-81). Tumor sites included kidney (n = 1), adrenal gland (n = 5) and liver (n = 14). We excluded 1 participant due to poor BH compliance, leaving 270 images from 18 participants for analysis. Mean TBH was 22.1, 23.9, and 24.2 seconds for EBH, DIBH, and IBH respectively. Screening selected EBH for 44% (n = 8), IBH for 39% (n = 7), and DIBH for 17% (n = 3) of participants. The mean RBH was superior at 0.92 mm (0.79 mm SD) for the personalized technique, compared with EBH of 1.79 mm (1.49 mm SD) (P = .016). Preplanned subset analysis of participants whose personalized technique was not EBH showed improved mean RBH of 0.63 mm (0.29 mm SD) compared with their EBH RBH of 2.2 mm (1.7 mm SD) (P = .011).In 56% of participants, DIBH or IBH demonstrated superior RBH compared with EBH. Personalised BH screening can inform selection of an ABC BH method which provides optimal RBH with improved TBH for an individual's planning and treatment course.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
進擊的巨人完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
李安全完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
llliu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
轻松的亦寒应助肉肉采纳,获得20
6秒前
星辰大海应助鞥枊采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
小二郎应助腼腆的绝山采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
小杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
晗月完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
via完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
wtt发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
ky一下完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
笔墨留香发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
谦让的巨人完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
18秒前
20秒前
20秒前
鞥枊发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
gabee完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
ymx发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
清秀的代珊完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975658
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3519986
关于积分的说明 11200481
捐赠科研通 3256410
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798247
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877490
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806376