净现值1
PRDM16
CEBPA公司
基因复制
髓样
癌症研究
内科学
融合转录本
融合基因
医学
生物
分子生物学
基因表达
基因
遗传学
核型
突变
染色体
作者
Norio Shiba,Kentaro Ohki,Tohru Kobayashi,Yusuke Hara,Genki Yamato,Reo Tanoshima,Hitoshi Ichikawa,Daisuke Tomizawa,Hyuntae Park,Akira Shimada,Manabu Sotomatsu,Hirokazu Arakawa,Keizo Horibe,Souichi Adachi,Takashi Taga,Akio Tawa,Yasuhide Hayashi
摘要
Summary Recent reports described the NUP 98‐ NSD 1 fusion as an adverse prognostic marker for acute myeloid leukaemia ( AML ) and PRDM 16 (also known as MEL 1 ) as the representative overexpressed gene in patients harbouring NUP 98‐ NSD 1 fusion. PRDM 16 gene expression levels were measured via real‐time polymerase chain reaction in 369 paediatric patients with de novo AML , of whom 84 (23%) exhibited PRDM 16 overexpression ( PRDM 16 / ABL 1 ratio ≥ 0·010). The frequencies of patients with high or low PRDM 16 expression differed widely with respect to each genetic alteration, as follows: t(8;21), 4% vs. 96%, P < 0·001; inv(16), 0% vs. 100%, P < 0·001; KMT 2A (also termed MLL )‐ partial tandem duplication, 100% vs. 0%, P < 0·001; NUP 98 ‐ NSD 1 , 100% vs. 0%, P < 0·001. The overall survival ( OS ) and event‐free survival ( EFS ) among PRDM 16‐ overexpressing patients were significantly worse than in patients with low PRDM 16 expression (3‐year OS : 51% vs. 81%, P < 0·001, 3‐year EFS : 32% vs. 64%, P < 0·001) irrespective of other cytogenetic alterations except for NPM 1 . PRDM 16 gene expression was particularly useful for stratifying FLT 3 ‐internal tandem duplication‐positive AML patients (3‐year OS : high = 30% vs. low = 70%, P < 0·001). PRDM 16 overexpression was highly recurrent in de novo paediatric AML patients with high/intermediate‐risk cytogenetic profiles and was independently associated with an adverse outcome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI