医学
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
肝性脑病
肝硬化
门体分流术
栓塞
门脉高压
临床终点
胃肠病学
随机对照试验
不利影响
外科
入射(几何)
内科学
物理
光学
作者
Yong Lv,Hui Chen,Bohan Luo,Wei Bai,Kai Li,Zhengyu Wang,Dongdong Xia,Wengang Guo,Qiuhe Wang,Xiaomei Li,Jie Yuan,Hong Cai,Jielai Xia,Zhanxin Yin,Daiming Fan,Guohong Han
出处
期刊:Hepatology
[Wiley]
日期:2022-03-10
卷期号:76 (3): 676-688
被引量:46
摘要
Large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) is associated with increased risk of HE in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic embolization of large SPSS at the time of TIPS creation could reduce the incidence of post-TIPS HE in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding.From June 2014 to August 2017, 56 patients with cirrhosis and large SPSS planning to undergo TIPS for the prevention of variceal bleeding were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive TIPS alone (TIPS group, n = 29) or TIPS plus simultaneous SPSS embolization (TIPS+E group, n = 27). The primary endpoint was overt HE. TIPS placement and SPSS embolization was successful in all patients. During a median follow-up of 24 months, the primary endpoint was met in 15 patients (51.7%) in the TIPS group and six patients (22.2%) in the TIPS+E group (p = 0.045). The 2-year cumulative incidence of overt HE was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared with the TIPS group (21.2% vs. 48.3%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97; p = 0.043). The 2-year incidence of recurrent bleeding (TIPS+E vs. TIPS, 15.4% vs. 25.1%; p = 0.522), shunt dysfunction (12.3% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.593), death (15.0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.352), and other adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups.In patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS for variceal bleeding, concurrent large SPSS embolization reduced the risk for overt HE without increasing other complications. Concurrent large SPSS embolization should therefore be considered for prophylaxis of post-TIPS HE.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI