Meta-Analysis Comparing Established Risk Prediction Models (EuroSCORE II, STS Score, and ACEF Score) for Perioperative Mortality During Cardiac Surgery

医学 欧洲分数 弗雷明翰风险评分 围手术期 内科学 荟萃分析 混淆 心脏外科 心脏病学 射血分数 预测建模 外科 心力衰竭 统计 数学 疾病
作者
Patrick G. Sullivan,Joshua D. Wallach,John P. A. Ioannidis
出处
期刊:American Journal of Cardiology [Elsevier]
卷期号:118 (10): 1574-1582 被引量:110
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.024
摘要

A wide variety of multivariable risk models have been developed to predict mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery; however, the relative utility of these models is unknown. This study investigated the literature related to comparisons made between established risk prediction models for perioperative mortality used in the setting of cardiac surgery. A systematic review was conducted to capture studies in cardiac surgery comparing the relative performance of at least 2 prediction models cited in recent guidelines (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE II], Society for Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models [STS] score, and Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score) for the outcomes of 1-month or inhospital mortality. For articles that met inclusion criteria, we extracted information on study design, predictive performance of risk models, and potential for bias. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate a summary estimate of the difference in AUCs between models. We identified 22 eligible studies that contained 33 comparisons among the above models. Meta-analysis of differences in AUCs revealed that the EuroSCORE II and STS score performed similarly (with a summary difference in AUC = 0.00), while outperforming the ACEF score (with summary differences in AUC of 0.10 and 0.08, respectively, p <0.05). Other metrics of discrimination and calibration were presented less consistently, and no study presented any metric of reclassification. Small sample size and absent descriptions of missing data were common in these studies. In conclusion, the EuroSCORE II and STS score outperform the ACEF score on discrimination. A wide variety of multivariable risk models have been developed to predict mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery; however, the relative utility of these models is unknown. This study investigated the literature related to comparisons made between established risk prediction models for perioperative mortality used in the setting of cardiac surgery. A systematic review was conducted to capture studies in cardiac surgery comparing the relative performance of at least 2 prediction models cited in recent guidelines (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE II], Society for Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models [STS] score, and Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score) for the outcomes of 1-month or inhospital mortality. For articles that met inclusion criteria, we extracted information on study design, predictive performance of risk models, and potential for bias. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate a summary estimate of the difference in AUCs between models. We identified 22 eligible studies that contained 33 comparisons among the above models. Meta-analysis of differences in AUCs revealed that the EuroSCORE II and STS score performed similarly (with a summary difference in AUC = 0.00), while outperforming the ACEF score (with summary differences in AUC of 0.10 and 0.08, respectively, p <0.05). Other metrics of discrimination and calibration were presented less consistently, and no study presented any metric of reclassification. Small sample size and absent descriptions of missing data were common in these studies. In conclusion, the EuroSCORE II and STS score outperform the ACEF score on discrimination.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
单薄的板凳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
温柔觅松完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
daidai发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
哔哩哔哩往上爬完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
温暖宛筠完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
nuonuomimi完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
唐小其完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
无私诗云完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
dyk完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高速旋转老沁完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
cxlhzq完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
情怀应助Marvel采纳,获得10
13秒前
qaplay完成签到 ,获得积分0
13秒前
大力水手完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
晨珂完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
远山完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
LM完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
六氟合铂酸氙完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
基因金完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
司空大有完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Fashioner8351完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
Dore完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
西门戆戆发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
小蓝人完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
tang发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
ZR14124完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
自由的蛋挞完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
芋头读文献完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
咔酱完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
24秒前
小太阳完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
i羽翼深蓝i完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
wenjian完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Vicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
superzyj发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
咔酱发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
大胆的忆寒完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Microlepidoptera Palaearctica, Volumes 1 and 3 - 13 (12-Volume Set) [German] 1122
Дружба 友好报 (1957-1958) 1000
The Data Economy: Tools and Applications 1000
Mantiden - Faszinierende Lauerjäger – Buch gebraucht kaufen 700
PraxisRatgeber Mantiden., faszinierende Lauerjäger. – Buch gebraucht kaufe 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3099839
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2751315
关于积分的说明 7612624
捐赠科研通 2403180
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1275200
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 616295
版权声明 599053