Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice

系统回顾 荟萃分析 梅德林 元回归 样本量测定 批判性评价 出版偏见 虚假关系 研究异质性 协议(科学) 医学 管理科学 心理学 替代医学 计算机科学 统计 机器学习 病理 数学 政治学 法学 经济
作者
Julian P. T. Higgins,Simon Thompson,Jonathan J Deeks,Douglas G. Altman
出处
期刊:Journal of Health Services Research & Policy [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:7 (1): 51-61 被引量:643
标识
DOI:10.1258/1355819021927674
摘要

Objective: Heterogeneity between study results can be a problem in any systematic review or meta-analysis of clinical trials. Identifying its presence, investigating its cause and correctly accounting for it in analyses all involve difficult decisions for the researcher. Our objectives were: to collate recommendations on the subject of dealing with heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials; to investigate current practice in addressing heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews; and to compare current practice with recommendations. Methods: We review guidelines for those undertaking systematic reviews and examine how heterogeneity is addressed in practice in a sample of systematic reviews, and their protocols, from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Results: Advice to reviewers is on the whole consistent and sensible. However, examination of a sample of Cochrane protocols and reviews demonstrates that the advice is difficult to follow given the small numbers of studies identified in many systematic reviews, the difficulty of pre-specifying important effect modifiers for subgroup analysis or meta-regression and the unresolved debate concerning fixed versus random effects metaanalyses. There was disagreement between protocols and reviews, often either regarding choice of important potential effect modifiers or due to the review identifying too few studies to perform planned analyses. Conclusion: Guidelines that address practical issues are required to reduce the risk of spurious findings from investigations of heterogeneity. This may involve discouraging statistical investigations such as subgroup analyses and meta-regression, rather than simply adopting a cautious approach to their interpretation, unless a large number of studies is available. The notion of a priori specification of potential effect modifiers for a retrospective review of studies is ill-defined, and the appropriateness of using a statistical test for heterogeneity to decide between analysis strategies is suspect.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
小周的读研日常完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
agrlook发布了新的文献求助50
7秒前
Hanoi347发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
panpan发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
点点发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
大胆鼠标完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
杨小坤完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
年糕完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
啦啦啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
晨晓完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
三方完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
我是老大应助馒头采纳,获得20
28秒前
30秒前
苏111发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
stella完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
超级幼旋完成签到,获得积分0
31秒前
默默的完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
WD完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
曹志伟发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
超级幼旋发布了新的文献求助30
36秒前
嘟嘟完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
zy完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
星辰大海应助怕黑凝海采纳,获得10
42秒前
上官若男应助怕黑凝海采纳,获得10
42秒前
在水一方应助Math4396采纳,获得10
43秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
超级桂桂发布了新的文献求助20
43秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
44秒前
45秒前
FashionBoy应助阿莱克修斯采纳,获得10
45秒前
48秒前
49秒前
weihua发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7189814
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8827234
关于积分的说明 18636915
捐赠科研通 6823249
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3174764
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2325732
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2149142