Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice

系统回顾 荟萃分析 梅德林 元回归 样本量测定 批判性评价 出版偏见 虚假关系 研究异质性 协议(科学) 医学 管理科学 心理学 替代医学 计算机科学 统计 机器学习 病理 数学 政治学 法学 经济
作者
Julian P. T. Higgins,Simon Thompson,Jonathan J Deeks,Douglas G. Altman
出处
期刊:Journal of Health Services Research & Policy [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:7 (1): 51-61 被引量:643
标识
DOI:10.1258/1355819021927674
摘要

Objective: Heterogeneity between study results can be a problem in any systematic review or meta-analysis of clinical trials. Identifying its presence, investigating its cause and correctly accounting for it in analyses all involve difficult decisions for the researcher. Our objectives were: to collate recommendations on the subject of dealing with heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials; to investigate current practice in addressing heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews; and to compare current practice with recommendations. Methods: We review guidelines for those undertaking systematic reviews and examine how heterogeneity is addressed in practice in a sample of systematic reviews, and their protocols, from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Results: Advice to reviewers is on the whole consistent and sensible. However, examination of a sample of Cochrane protocols and reviews demonstrates that the advice is difficult to follow given the small numbers of studies identified in many systematic reviews, the difficulty of pre-specifying important effect modifiers for subgroup analysis or meta-regression and the unresolved debate concerning fixed versus random effects metaanalyses. There was disagreement between protocols and reviews, often either regarding choice of important potential effect modifiers or due to the review identifying too few studies to perform planned analyses. Conclusion: Guidelines that address practical issues are required to reduce the risk of spurious findings from investigations of heterogeneity. This may involve discouraging statistical investigations such as subgroup analyses and meta-regression, rather than simply adopting a cautious approach to their interpretation, unless a large number of studies is available. The notion of a priori specification of potential effect modifiers for a retrospective review of studies is ill-defined, and the appropriateness of using a statistical test for heterogeneity to decide between analysis strategies is suspect.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
华1m完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
沉默毛巾完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
NQS发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
HENRYMINE发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
5秒前
小立发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
bsf123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ocean完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
wanci应助Tianxiang采纳,获得10
9秒前
是小天呀发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
朱宣诚发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
学霸业应助缓慢如南采纳,获得10
12秒前
YengFing应助ATASHIPA采纳,获得10
12秒前
Hello应助吴DrYDYY采纳,获得10
12秒前
云为翳发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
桃桃完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
秋沫完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Limerence发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
HuiLang应助binru采纳,获得10
16秒前
忽悠老羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
zhoukexiao发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
深情安青应助明兰采纳,获得10
19秒前
在水一方应助明理的觅海采纳,获得10
20秒前
黑炭球完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
FashionBoy应助NQS采纳,获得10
23秒前
景尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
wuuu完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
灵剑山完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
超级盼海发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
有魅力姿发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
斯文败类应助超级的灵凡采纳,获得10
28秒前
HuiLang应助李细细采纳,获得10
28秒前
smmu008完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
清泉发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 530
Lengua e imagen en la comunicación digital 500
A First Course in Options Pricing Theory 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7481258
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9074420
关于积分的说明 19351410
捐赠科研通 7097673
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3247703
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2416512
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2232910