干预(咨询)
产业政策
反问句
国家(计算机科学)
战斗
背景(考古学)
经济干预主义
政治
政府(语言学)
政治经济学
联合政府
经济
公共行政
社会学
政治学
经济
市场经济
法学
历史
哲学
考古
精神科
语言学
计算机科学
心理学
算法
出处
期刊:Local Economy
[SAGE]
日期:2010-12-01
卷期号:25 (8): 622-630
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1080/02690942.2010.533421
摘要
This article seeks to demonstrate two simple points about industrial policy in England. First, industrial policy matters, but if there is to be an effective and fruitful debate about industrial policy, it must not be insular. It must be located within the wider context of the ongoing battle of ideas in the discipline of political economy about the appropriate roles for the state and market in enhancing economic development. Second, the debate about industrial policy must not occur in an historical vacuum, but must learn the lesson of the interventions by the Thatcher, Blair and Brown Governments. These have demonstrated that all British governments have intervened and have picked winners. The Cameron-Clegg coalition government will be no different despite its rhetorical commitment to rolling back radically the frontiers of state spending and intervention
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI