标准化
医学
术语
免疫组织化学
临床实习
病理
计算机科学
家庭医学
语言学
哲学
操作系统
作者
Emina Torlakovic,Søren Laurentius Nielsen,Glenn Francis,J. R. Garratt,Blake Gilks,Jeffrey D. Goldsmith,Jason L. Hornick,Elizabeth Hyjek,Mostafa Ibrahim,Keith Miller,Eugen Bogdan Petcu,Paul E. Swanson,Xiaoge Zhou,Clive R. Taylor,Mogens Vyberg
出处
期刊:Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology
日期:2014-04-01
卷期号:22 (4): 241-252
被引量:72
标识
DOI:10.1097/pai.0000000000000069
摘要
Standardization of controls, both positive and negative controls, is needed for diagnostic immunohistochemistry (dIHC). The use of IHC-negative controls, irrespective of type, although well established, is not standardized. As such, the relevance and applicability of negative controls continues to challenge both pathologists and laboratory budgets. Despite the clear theoretical notion that appropriate controls serve to demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the dIHC test, it remains unclear which types of positive and negative controls are applicable and/or useful in day-to-day clinical practice. There is a perceived need to provide “best practice recommendations” for the use of negative controls. This perception is driven not only by logistics and cost issues, but also by increased pressure for accurate IHC testing, especially when IHC is performed for predictive markers, the number of which is rising as personalized medicine continues to develop. Herein, an international ad hoc expert panel reviews classification of negative controls relevant to clinical practice, proposes standard terminology for negative controls, considers the total evidence of IHC specificity that is available to pathologists, and develops a set of recommendations for the use of negative controls in dIHC based on “fit-for-use” principles.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI