医学
荟萃分析
科克伦图书馆
置信区间
不利影响
富血小板血浆
随机对照试验
相对风险
内科学
严格标准化平均差
患者满意度
安慰剂
物理疗法
背痛
可视模拟标度
临床试验
出版偏见
梅德林
子群分析
系统回顾
外科
血小板
法学
政治学
作者
Xuan Zhang,Wenjun Yu,Yichen Dou,Tao Wang
出处
期刊:Journal of neurological surgery
[Georg Thieme Verlag KG]
日期:2020-05-21
卷期号:81 (06): 529-534
被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1709170
摘要
Abstract Background Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may be beneficial for patients with low back pain. However, the results remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of PRP for low back pain. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on low back pain were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcome was pain scores within 8 weeks. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results Three RCTs involving 131 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for low back pain, PRP injection was found to reduce pain scores significantly (mean difference: − 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 2.12 to − 0.81; p < 0.0001), improve the number of patients with > 50% pain relief at 3 months (risk ratio [RR]: 4.14; 95% CI, 2.22–7.74; p < 0.00001), and offer relatively good patient satisfaction (RR: 1.91; 95% CI, 1.04–3.53; p = 0.04). No increase in adverse events was reported after PRP injection (RR: 1.92; 95% CI, 0.94-3.91; p = 0.07). Conclusions Compared with control intervention for low back pain, PRP injection was found to improve pain relief and patient satisfaction significantly with no increase in adverse events.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI