Artificial intelligence-based model for lymph node metastases detection on whole slide images in bladder cancer: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study

医学 膀胱切除术 淋巴结 回顾性队列研究 膀胱癌 癌症 前列腺癌 解剖(医学) 放射科 外科 内科学
作者
Shaoxu Wu,Guibin Hong,Xun Xu,Hong Zeng,Xulin Chen,Yun Wang,Yun Luo,Peng Wu,Cundong Liu,Ning Jiang,Qiang Dang,Cheng Yang,Bohao Liu,Runnan Shen,Zeshi Chen,Chengxiao Liao,Zhen Lin,Jin Wang,Tianxin Lin
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier]
卷期号:24 (4): 360-370 被引量:84
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00061-x
摘要

Summary

Background

Accurate lymph node staging is important for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with bladder cancer. We aimed to develop a lymph node metastases diagnostic model (LNMDM) on whole slide images and to assess the clinical effect of an artificial intelligence-assisted (AI) workflow.

Methods

In this retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study in China, we included consecutive patients with bladder cancer who had radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, and from whom whole slide images of lymph node sections were available, for model development. We excluded patients with non-bladder cancer and concurrent surgery, or low-quality images. Patients from two hospitals (Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) were assigned before a cutoff date to a training set and after the date to internal validation sets for each hospital. Patients from three other hospitals (the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) were included as external validation sets. A validation subset of challenging cases from the five validation sets was used to compare performance between the LNMDM and pathologists, and two other datasets (breast cancer from the CAMELYON16 dataset and prostate cancer from the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University) were collected for a multi-cancer test. The primary endpoint was diagnostic sensitivity in the four prespecified groups (ie, the five validation sets, a single-lymph-node test set, the multi-cancer test set, and the subset for a performance comparison between the LNMDM and pathologists).

Findings

Between Jan 1, 2013 and Dec 31, 2021, 1012 patients with bladder cancer had radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection and were included (8177 images and 20 954 lymph nodes). We excluded 14 patients (165 images) with concurrent non-bladder cancer and also excluded 21 low-quality images. We included 998 patients and 7991 images (881 [88%] men; 117 [12%] women; median age 64 years [IQR 56–72]; ethnicity data not available; 268 [27%] with lymph node metastases) to develop the LNMDM. The area under the curve (AUC) for accurate diagnosis of the LNMDM ranged from 0·978 (95% CI 0·960–0·996) to 0·998 (0·996–1·000) in the five validation sets. Performance comparisons between the LNMDM and pathologists showed that the diagnostic sensitivity of the model (0·983 [95% CI 0·941–0·998]) substantially exceeded that of both junior pathologists (0·906 [0·871–0·934]) and senior pathologists (0·947 [0·919–0·968]), and that AI assistance improved sensitivity for both junior (from 0·906 without AI to 0·953 with AI) and senior (from 0·947 to 0·986) pathologists. In the multi-cancer test, the LNMDM maintained an AUC of 0·943 (95% CI 0·918–0·969) in breast cancer images and 0·922 (0·884–0·960) in prostate cancer images. In 13 patients, the LNMDM detected tumour micrometastases that had been missed by pathologists who had previously classified these patients' results as negative. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the LNMDM would enable pathologists to exclude 80–92% of negative slides while maintaining 100% sensitivity in clinical application.

Interpretation

We developed an AI-based diagnostic model that did well in detecting lymph node metastases, particularly micrometastases. The LNMDM showed substantial potential for clinical applications in improving the accuracy and efficiency of pathologists' work.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, the National Key Research and Development Programme of China, and the Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Urological Diseases.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ应助Ps采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
Ava应助萝卜采纳,获得10
刚刚
fafamimireredo完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
XDD完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助zimuxinxin采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
非布司他发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
maguodrgon发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
wy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
张安安发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
SciGPT应助red采纳,获得10
7秒前
星河在眼里完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助陈某采纳,获得10
8秒前
殴打阿达发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
无花果应助小草三心采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Iamak24完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
邱曾烨发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
晚夜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
CodeCraft应助殴打阿达采纳,获得10
12秒前
Hello应助小夏采纳,获得10
12秒前
月屿发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
lxh发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Hyh_orz发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
呼呼呼完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
英姑应助非布司他采纳,获得10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6041186
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7779820
关于积分的说明 16233436
捐赠科研通 5187140
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2775723
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1758816
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1642296