A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders

心理信息 大麻 上瘾 禁欲 心理干预 系统回顾 梅德林 荟萃分析 兴奋剂 精神科 出版偏见 心理学 临床心理学 医学 科克伦图书馆 内科学 法学 政治学
作者
Melvyn Zhang,Jiangbo Ying,Tracey Wing,Guo Song,Daniel Fung,Helen Smith
出处
期刊:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [MDPI AG]
卷期号:15 (6): 1138-1138 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.3390/ijerph15061138
摘要

Background: Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggested that automatic attention biases might be responsible for relapse. Prior reviews have provided evidence for the presence of these biases in addictive disorders and the effectiveness of bias modification. However, the prior studies are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have failed to adopt a systematic approach in evidence synthesis. Objectives: The primary aim of this current systematic review is to synthesise the current evidence for attention biases amongst opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of attention bias modification interventions and other addictions related outcomes. Methods: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Six randomised trials were identified. The evidence synthesized from these trials have provided strong evidence that attentional biases are present in opioid and stimulant use disorders. Evidence synthesis for other secondary outcome measures could not be performed given the heterogeneity in the measures reported and the limited number of trials. The risk of bias assessment for the included trials revealed a high risk of selection and attrition bias. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the potential need for interventions targeting attention biases in opiate and cocaine use disorders.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英俊的铭应助狗蛋采纳,获得10
1秒前
彭于晏应助1111采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
小于完成签到,获得积分0
2秒前
和谐依波发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
NexusExplorer应助清秀的尔曼采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
zhao发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
佘楽完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
努力小周发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
华仔应助超级尔白采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
跳跃的夜柳关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
余春完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
mly完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
勤劳的颦发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
和谐依波完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
大模型应助星落枝头采纳,获得10
13秒前
清秀的尔曼完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
阿透完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
CodeCraft应助雾让空山采纳,获得10
16秒前
坂井泉水发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
orixero应助钻石好友采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
jdjd发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
358489228完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
拜拜拜仁完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
崔崔完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6018209
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7605268
关于积分的说明 16158305
捐赠科研通 5165718
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765013
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746543
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635302