Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 不利影响 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 类阿片 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 相对风险 止痛药 物理疗法 麻醉 内科学 置信区间 受体 法学 政治学
作者
Julio F. Fiore,Charbel El‐Kefraoui,Marc-Aurèle Chay,Philip Nguyen-Powanda,Uyen Do,Ghadeer Olleik,Fateme Rajabiyazdi,Araz Kouyoumdjian,Alexa Derksen,Tara Landry,Alexandre Amar‐Zifkin,Amy Bergeron,Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar,Marc O. Martel,L. Lee,Gabriele Baldini,Liane S. Feldman
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:399 (10343): 2280-2293 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00582-7
摘要

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050).47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes.Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_5Y7B75发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
不想干活应助胡呼呼采纳,获得10
1秒前
疯狂的天宇完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Owen应助晨纯采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研副本完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
duorou发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Wrr完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
未何发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
叮咚jingle发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
研友_nv2krn完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
8秒前
wjx发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
张三完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
风一样的风干肠完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
elebug发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
YBR发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
LMW应助羊咩咩哒采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
未何完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wanci应助小耀君采纳,获得30
10秒前
木子木公完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI5应助鲸鱼采纳,获得10
11秒前
小张完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
搜集达人应助demo1采纳,获得10
11秒前
李爱国应助nuomici采纳,获得10
11秒前
Geass发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
圆锥香蕉完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
炙热树叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4602661
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4011768
关于积分的说明 12420364
捐赠科研通 3692108
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2035470
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1068575
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 953144