Unravelling Uncertainty Inception: When We Really Know That We Don't Know?

需要知道 知情权 政治学 计算机科学 法学 计算机安全
作者
Lara Daniela Matos Cunha,Filipa Ventura,Márcia Pestana‐Santos,Lurdes Lomba,Margarida Reis Santos
出处
期刊:Nursing Philosophy [Wiley]
卷期号:26 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1111/nup.70004
摘要

Through technical rationality, healthcare professionals address instrumental problems by applying the theory and technique arising from scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, the divergent situations of practice characterised by uncertainty, instability, and uniqueness place nurses in a positivist epistemological dilemma. Decision-making under uncertainty is a challenge that nurses face in clinical practice daily. Nurses anticipate critical events based on the interaction between (un)known factors of clinical reasoning, putting uncertainty tolerance into perspective. With undeniable epistemological relevance, few nursing researchers have addressed this issue. Based on the insights garnered from the panel held at the 26th International Nursing Philosophy Conference, this discussion paper examines the inception of uncertainty within nursing reasoning, intertwining introspection, abstraction, and the rich discussions from the conference. Accordingly, the philosophical underpinnings of the perceived experience of uncertainty will be briefly addressed, while framing the decision-making challenges faced by nurses. A compelling dimension of nursing care emerges when we delve into the inception of uncertainty, prompting a deeper examination of the interplay between its perception and consciousness in clinical practice, and the gravitation of uncertainty in the process of empirical reasoning. Navigating uncertainty involves varying individual responses, influenced by tolerance levels. Moral appropriateness is determined by their adaptability rather than solely their positivity or logical consistency, highlighting constancy as a quality demanding alignment with an understanding of challenges.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
香蕉觅云应助HXY采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
小周发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
3秒前
逆旅发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
雯雯子发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
wei发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Promise发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
lvsehx发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
洋山芋发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Zn1完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
赘婿应助哪有你好采纳,获得10
8秒前
呆桃发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
我爱乒乓球完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
小蘑菇应助stellazhuo采纳,获得30
12秒前
寻123发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
wanci应助麻辣洋芋采纳,获得10
14秒前
李健应助哈哈2022采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
脑洞疼应助丶氵一生里采纳,获得100
15秒前
16秒前
香蕉觅云应助木之尹采纳,获得30
16秒前
香蕉觅云应助鱼大仙采纳,获得10
16秒前
刘琪琪完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
赘婿应助jiyihan采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
上官若男应助zyy0605采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
章鱼哥想毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
端庄代荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
LYchem应助寻123采纳,获得10
25秒前
Promise完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
System in Systemic Functional Linguistics A System-based Theory of Language 1000
Дружба 友好报 (1957-1958) 1000
The Data Economy: Tools and Applications 1000
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
Mantiden - Faszinierende Lauerjäger – Buch gebraucht kaufen 600
PraxisRatgeber Mantiden., faszinierende Lauerjäger. – Buch gebraucht kaufe 600
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3117099
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2767036
关于积分的说明 7689541
捐赠科研通 2422396
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1286206
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 620271
版权声明 599837