评定量表
心理学
萧条(经济学)
研究诊断标准
汉密尔顿抑郁量表
临床心理学
精神科
验证试验
比例(比率)
心理测量学
测试有效性
发展心理学
重性抑郁障碍
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
心情
经济
宏观经济学
物理
量子力学
作者
G. A. Fava,Robert Kellner,Franca Munari,Luigi Pavan
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1982.tb00911.x
摘要
The Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (HDRS) has become the standard observer rating scale for depression, yet there are no adequate data from normal samples. The present study was carried out in northern Italy. The purposes were 1) to examine the ratings in normals and 2) to examine the scale's validity in a different language and culture. The scale was used in 40 normals and 40 depressives who were matched. Two self‐rating scales of depression were administered: the Symptom Rating Test and the Symptom Questionnaire. The results show that the HDRS is a valid mea‐ sure in that it sensitively discriminates between depressed patients and normals. The findings support Hamilton's view that only the first 17 items of the scale are appropriate for computing the score. The use of self‐rating scales yielded additional information. The misclassification rate of the Symptom Rating Test was similar to that of the HDRS. The combined use of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) and HDRS appears to be more reliable for the selection of depressed patients for research than the RDC only.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI