<i>Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature</i> (review)

认识论 哲学 叙述的 背景(考古学) 社会学 哲学与文学 英雄 哲学方法论 诗歌 文学类 语言学 生物 艺术 古生物学
作者
Wayne C. Booth
出处
期刊:Philosophy and Literature [Johns Hopkins University Press]
卷期号:15 (2): 302-310 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1353/phl.1991.0027
摘要

Critical Discussions Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature , by Martha C. Nussbaum; 483 pp. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, $42.50. Discussed by Wayne C. Booth Love's Knowledge seems to me by all odds the best modern discussion of the ways in which what we call philosophy and what we call literature interrelate. Its chief claim is that "literature," especially fictional narratives, can perform a philosophical role that eludes all discursive philosophy. What's more, the discourse we call philosophy will be best performed when it acknowledges its indebtedness, and in at least one dimension its subordination, to the ethical work of the "poets." Though philosophers like Nussbaum herself can assist in uncovering and appreciating the unique philosophical contribution of the poets, they can never hope to pursue human truth with full adequacy on their own. The poets, and especially those who create long, subde, moral tales, capture and embody truths that escape the coarse nets of all non-narrative thought. In a work that openly relies on Aristotle as its philosophical hero, Nussbaum comes close to going the Master one better by implying that poetry is not only more philosophical than history; it is more philosophical than philosophy. Poetry at its best, unlike too much philosophy, insists on the particularity and context-boundedness of moral deliberation ; it shows people making choices not according to highly general norms but instead according to nuanced perceptions of character and circumstance. As Aristotle says again and again, ethical norms are not established by abstract thinking but by reference to our experience of Philosophy and Literature, © 1991, 15: 302-310 Wayne C. Booth303 how a virtuous person would choose, always modulating general moral principles by reference to close perceptions of particular circumstances. Philosophy by its nature does not provide us with that experience. Only fine narratives can engage us in the detailed sharing of choices with morally alert characters, as they struggle not only with abstract principles but with and through "fine perceptions" that can both underline and challenge abstract principles. Consequendy only such narratives can educate us fully in sensitive moral choice and thus protect us from the misleading abstractions implicit in purely discursive reasoning. (Presumably prolonged, intimate discussion with loved ones in "real life" might rival fictions in complexity and precision. Nussbaum is mainly concerned with that other rival, philosophy. But I'm quite sure that she would consider even the most moral, most sensitive illiterate as comparatively handicapped—unless oral narrative had provided the antidote .) In her view, even such major philosophers as Plato and Kant, in their pursuit of universal standards, will inevitably mislead us, unless we counteract their elevation of abstract thought over emotion by submerging ourselves in the complexities of real moral choices. Though Aristotle, better than any other philosopher, can tell us how such choices work, they are made dramatically effective for us only in great poetry, and especially in the great longer fictions: epics and novels. Long narratives teach us best because in them we dwell intimately with human characters who face genuinely pressing, complex, and precise moral dilemmas. Only in them do we experience, albeit in vicarious form, the kinds of choices that real life presents: that is, choices among conflicting values that are in fact incommensurable. It isjust this reality of incommensurability, the raw painful fact that some genuine values cannot be harmonized or reduced under this or that hierarchical system, that is dramatized by the most sensitive creators of long fictions. Their heroes and heroines face conflicts ofgoods that are feltby the choosers— and thus by their readers—to be both conflicting and genuine. Choices among these goods cannot be made by deciding that one of them is not a good at all, or that it is simply a lesser good on a scale ordered by some supreme good. Nussbaum's repeated arguments for ultimate incommensurability are subtle and powerful, and they alone would be "worth the entry fee." She might, however, in future work, enrich her case not only by more detailed reference to the arguments of Hilary Putnam, whose work she glances at, but to Isaiah Berlin and Richard McKeon, who each spent 304Philosophy and Literature a...
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
one完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
可可完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
专一的白萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Angenstern完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
situxlin发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zjh发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
shenmexixi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小马甲应助迷路的初柔采纳,获得10
3秒前
xushaojun完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
星辰大海应助邹长飞采纳,获得10
4秒前
春去春来发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
sdsd发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
攒一口袋星星完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
YOLO完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
cach完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Crystal发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
Rosaline发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
fffffffq完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
zjh完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
菜炸炸呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
纯情的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
rakuyo发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
医学帅哥完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
谢明渝完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助hmbb采纳,获得10
11秒前
翁瑶婧发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
发飙的牛发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
清秀寄风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
怡然万声完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
SciGPT应助CHF采纳,获得10
13秒前
思源应助biozy采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3969322
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3514152
关于积分的说明 11172188
捐赠科研通 3249407
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794832
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875437
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804781