医学
厄贝沙坦
肾功能
蛋白尿
内科学
临床终点
肾病
不利影响
泌尿科
肌酐
中期分析
随机对照试验
尿检
胃肠病学
尿
内分泌学
血压
糖尿病
肾
作者
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink,Jai Radhakrishnan,Charles E. Alpers,Jonathan Barratt,Stewart Bieler,Ulysses Diva,Jula K. Inrig,Radko Komers,Alex Mercer,Irene L. Noronha,Michelle N. Rheault,William E. Rote,Brad H. Rovin,Howard Trachtman,Hernán Trimarchi,Muh Geot Wong,Vlado Perkovic,Eric Alarmartine,Jonathan Barratt,Dong‐Wan Chae
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2023-04-01
卷期号:401 (10388): 1584-1594
被引量:137
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00569-x
摘要
Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being examined in an ongoing phase 3 trial in adults with IgA nephropathy. We report the prespecified interim analysis of the primary proteinuria efficacy endpoint, and safety.PROTECT is an international, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, being conducted in 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries. The study examines sparsentan versus irbesartan in adults (aged ≥18 years) with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of 1·0 g/day or higher despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sparsentan 400 mg once daily or irbesartan 300 mg once daily, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate at screening (30 to <60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 and ≥60 mL/min per 1·73 m2) and urine protein excretion at screening (≤1·75 g/day and >1·75 g/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 36 in urine protein-creatinine ratio based on a 24-h urine sample, assessed using mixed model repeated measures. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were safety endpoints. All endpoints were examined in all participants who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. The study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850.Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 404 participants were randomly assigned to sparsentan (n=202) or irbesartan (n=202) and received treatment. At week 36, the geometric least squares mean percent change from baseline in urine protein-creatinine ratio was statistically significantly greater in the sparsentan group (-49·8%) than the irbesartan group (-15·1%), resulting in a between-group relative reduction of 41% (least squares mean ratio=0·59; 95% CI 0·51-0·69; p<0·0001). TEAEs with sparsentan were similar to irbesartan. There were no cases of severe oedema, heart failure, hepatotoxicity, or oedema-related discontinuations. Bodyweight changes from baseline were not different between the sparsentan and irbesartan groups.Once-daily treatment with sparsentan produced meaningful reduction in proteinuria compared with irbesartan in adults with IgA nephropathy. Safety of sparsentan was similar to irbesartan. Future analyses after completion of the 2-year double-blind period will show whether these beneficial effects translate into a long-term nephroprotective potential of sparsentan.Travere Therapeutics.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI