痉挛
医学
张力亢进
脊髓损伤
脑瘫
物理医学与康复
反射
置信区间
荟萃分析
麻醉
根切断术
脊髓
物理疗法
内科学
精神科
作者
Youngkyung Jung,Sara Breitbart,Anahita Malvea,Anuj Bhatia,George M. Ibrahim,Carolina Gorodetsky
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.158
摘要
Spasticity is a form of muscle hypertonia secondary to various diseases, including traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Medical treatments are available; however, these often result in insufficient clinical response. This review evaluates the role of epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of spasticity and associated functional outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Embase, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE databases. We included studies that used epidural SCS to treat spasticity. Studies investigating functional electric stimulation, transcutaneous SCS, and animal models of spasticity were excluded. We also excluded studies that used SCS to treat other symptoms such as pain. Thirty-four studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of subjective improvement in spasticity was 78% (95% confidence interval, 64%–91%; I2 = 77%), 40% (95% confidence interval, 7%–73%; I2 = 88%) for increased H-reflex threshold or decreased Hoffman reflex/muscle response wave ratio, and 73% (65%–80%; I2 = 50%) for improved ambulation. Patients with spinal causes had better outcomes compared with patients with cerebral causes. Up to 10% of patients experienced complications including infections and hardware malfunction. Our review of the literature suggests that SCS may be a safe and useful tool for the management of spasticity; however, there is significant heterogeneity among studies. The quality of studies is also low. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the usefulness of this technology, including various stimulation paradigms across different causes of spasticity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI