Preventive strategies for low anterior resection syndrome: a protocol for systematic review and evidence mapping

医学 系统回顾 梅德林 检查表 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 协议(科学) 随机对照试验 循证医学 分级(工程) 重症监护医学 外科 替代医学 内科学 病理 心理学 土木工程 政治学 法学 认知心理学 工程类
作者
Xinyu Zhang,Kelu Yang,Yang Li,Rui-Shu Li,Shi-Qi Wang,Xiaonan Liu,Quan Wang
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:13 (12): e077279-e077279 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077279
摘要

Introduction Rectal cancer is one of the top 10 cancers worldwide. Up to 80% of patients with rectal tumours have had sphincter-saving surgery, mainly due to the large expectation of anal preservation. However, patients tend to experience low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection, which is disordered bowel function that includes faecal incontinence, urgency, frequent defecation, constipation and evacuation difficulties. LARS, with an estimated prevalence of 41%, has been reported to substantially decrease the quality of life of patients. However, no comprehensive preventive strategies are currently available for LARS. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the current LARS preventive strategies. Methods and analysis This protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. Literature in PubMed (via Medline), Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2023 will be searched to identify articles relevant to preventive effectiveness against LARS. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for clinical controlled trials, cohort studies and case–control studies will be used to assess the risk of bias. We will group the included studies by the type of LARS prevention strategy and present an overview of the main findings in the form of evidence mapping. A meta-analysis is planned if there is no substantial clinical heterogeneity between the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not needed for systematic review of published data. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at scientific conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023402886.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ应助谨慎乐安采纳,获得10
1秒前
hokin33发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
houchengru发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
爆米花应助风时因絮采纳,获得10
6秒前
cqh关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
7秒前
温婉的电灯胆完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Nancy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
我的miemie发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
谨慎乐安完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
化月舞发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Singularity应助岁晚采纳,获得10
9秒前
hyl完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
勤奋的大便完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
潘Pdm完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
在水一方应助没所谓采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
yin关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助豪哥大大采纳,获得10
17秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
i说晚安完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
zjguan发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
可乐发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
慕青应助豪哥大大采纳,获得10
17秒前
pluto应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
Manual of Sewer Condition Classification 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3122658
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2773077
关于积分的说明 7716550
捐赠科研通 2428645
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1289889
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 621635
版权声明 600185