Treatment effects after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne vs tissue-borne miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance

The study investigated the skeletal effects and root resorption in young adults with maxillary transverse deficiency after tissue-borne or tooth-borne mini-implant anchorage maxillary expansion.Ninety-one young adults with maxillary transverse deficiency, aged 16-25 years, were divided into 3 groups according to the treatment method: group A (n = 29) comprising patients treated with tissue-borne miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), the group B (n = 32) comprising patients treated with tooth-borne MARPE, and the control group (n = 30) comprising patients only treated with fixed orthodontic therapies. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography images were used to assess the change of maxillary width, nasal width, first molar torque and root volume by paired t test in the 3 groups, respectively. Analysis of variance and Tukey least significant difference analysis were used to detect the changes of all descriptions among the 3 groups P <0.05.In the 2 experimental groups, we observed significant increases in the width of the maxilla, nasal, and arch width, as well as the molar torque. In addition, the height of the alveolar bone and the root volume decreased significantly. There were no significant differences in the maxilla, nasal, and arch width change between the 2 groups. Group B displayed more increases in buccal tipping, alveolar bone loss, and root volume loss than group A (P <0.05). Compared with groups A and B, the control group showed negligible tooth volume loss, with no expansion effect in both skeletal and dental descriptions.Tissue-borne MARPE produced the same expansion efficiency as tooth-borne MARPE. However, tooth-borne MARPE causes more dentoalveolar side effects in buccal tipping, root resorption and alveolar bone loss.