Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer

医学 乳腺癌 乳腺摄影术 乳房磁振造影 邦费罗尼校正 医学物理学 家庭医学 癌症 内科学 统计 数学
作者
Wendie A. Berg,Andriy I. Bandos,M. Gabriela Sava
出处
期刊:Journal of The American College of Radiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (8): 758-768 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.014
摘要

To guide implementation of supplemental breast screening by assessing patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology.In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol, from March 23 to June 3, 2022, we contacted 579 women who had both CEM screening and MRI. Women were e-mailed an invitation to complete an online survey developed using an AHP-based model to elicit preferences for CEM or MRI. Methods for categorical data analysis were used to evaluate factors affecting preferences, under the Bonferroni correction for multiplicity.Complete responses were received from 222 (38.3%) women; the 189 women with a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age 61.8 years, and the 34 women without a personal history of breast cancer had a mean age of 53.6 years. Of 222 respondents, 157 (70.7%, confidence interval [CI]: 64.7-76.7) were determined to prefer CEM to MRI. Breast positioning was the most important criterion for 74 of 222 (33.3%) respondents, with claustrophobia, intravenous line placement, and overall stress most important for 38, 37, and 39 women (17.1%, 16.7%, and 17.6%), respectively, and noise level, contrast injection, and indifference being emphasized least frequently (by 10 [4.5%], 11 [5.0%], and 13 [5.9%] women, respectively). CEM preference was most prevalent (MRI least prevalent) for respondents emphasizing claustrophobia (37 of 38 [97%], CI: 86.2-99.9); CEM preference was least prevalent (MRI most prevalent) for respondents emphasizing breast positioning (40 of 74 [54%], CI: 42.1-65.7).AHP-based modeling reveals strong patient preferences for CEM over MRI, with claustrophobia favoring preference for CEM and breast positioning relatively favoring preference for MRI. Our results should help guide implementation of screening CEM and MRI.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
望除完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
cryjslong完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
zzk发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
粥粥发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
LSL丶完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
面壁思过举报cheng求助涉嫌违规
5秒前
DOODBYE发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助LSL丶采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助怕黑的白玉采纳,获得10
7秒前
so发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
曹丞相好可爱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
rick3455发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
10秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小梁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
wjwqz完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
ste完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
地球发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
情书发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
小蘑菇应助123采纳,获得10
12秒前
文章发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
没烦恼有头脑完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Health Psychology 800
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7595117
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9171915
关于积分的说明 19633622
捐赠科研通 7172514
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3267793
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432577
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2260816