Addressing Limitations in Stillbirth Assessment Research: A Call for Broader Perspectives

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyEarly View LETTER TO THE EDITOR Addressing Limitations in Stillbirth Assessment Research: A Call for Broader Perspectives Sijia Liu, Sijia Liu School of Law and Intellectual Property, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJialao Ma, Corresponding Author Jialao Ma [email protected] The Affiliated Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence: Jialao Ma ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author Sijia Liu, Sijia Liu School of Law and Intellectual Property, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJialao Ma, Corresponding Author Jialao Ma [email protected] The Affiliated Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence: Jialao Ma ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author First published: 08 January 2025 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18061 Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. [REFERRING TO Riches, N.O., Workalemahu, T., Johnson, E.P., Lopez, S., Blue, N., Page, J., Silver, R.M. and Rothwell, E. (2024), Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis. BJOG. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18038.] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookxLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1N. O. Riches, T. Workalemahu, E. P. Johnson, et al., "Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis," BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2024), https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18038. 10.1111/1471-0528.18038 PubMedGoogle Scholar 2K. M. Mazor, B. E. Clauser, T. Field, R. A. Yood, and J. H. Gurwitz, "A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys," Health Services Research 37, no. 5 (2002): 1403–1417, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.11194. 10.1111/1475-6773.11194 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3M. Schweda, S. Schicktanz, A. Raz, and A. Silvers, "Beyond Cultural Stereotyping: Views on End-Of-Life Decision Making Among Religious and Secular Persons in the USA, Germany, and Israel," BMC Medical Ethics 18 (2017): 13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0170-4. 10.1186/s12910-017-0170-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4S. C. Lean, H. Derricott, R. L. Jones, and A. E. P. Heazell, "Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLoS One 12, no. 10 (2017): e0186287, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186287. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186287 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation