医学
危险系数
置信区间
队列
内科学
不利影响
回顾性队列研究
外科
作者
Jian-Cong Weng,Zhifeng Zhang,Da Li,Junmei Wang,Guilin Li,Yulun Xu,Jun Yang,Junting Zhang,Wenqing Jia
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2019-05-13
卷期号:86 (4): 548-556
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyz143
摘要
Abstract BACKGROUND Limited data existed to guide the management of intraspinal neurenteric cysts (ISNECs). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS), elucidate the radiological features of ISNECs, and propose a treatment protocol. METHODS From 2003 to 2015, 121 patients with pathologically confirmed ISNECs treated at our institute were included in this study. Pertinent risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 55 (44.6%) patients; 106 (87.6%), 12 (9.9%), and 3 (2.5%) ISNECs were classified as Wilkins A, B, and C, respectively. After a median follow-up duration of 64.2 mo, recurrence occurred in 25 (22.7%) patients, with a median PFS time of 43.1 mo. The actuarial PFS rates at 5 and 10 yr were 73.2% and 66.2%, respectively. The actuarial overall survival rates at 5 and 10 yr were 100% and 97.6%, respectively. Non-GTR (hazard ratio [HR], 5.836; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.698-20.058; P = .005), Wilkins B/C (HR, 3.129; 95% CI, 1.009-9.702; P = .048), and a history of surgical resection (HR, 3.690; 95% CI, 1.536-8.864; P = .004) were adverse factors. CONCLUSION GTR and Wilkins A were favorable factors for PFS. If tolerable, GTR alone was advocated as an optimal treatment. Because of the benign nature and favorable prognosis, non-GTR was an alternative if GTR failed. Close follow-up was needed because of the recurrent tendency of ISNEC. Future study with a large cohort is necessary to verify our findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI