医学
虚弱指数
接收机工作特性
置信区间
逻辑回归
康复
优势比
急症护理
多元分析
多元统计
物理疗法
预测效度
队列
内科学
医疗保健
机器学习
经济
临床心理学
经济增长
计算机科学
作者
Anna K. Stuck,Joel M. Mangold,R. Wittwer,Andreas Limacher,Heike A. Bischoff‐Ferrari
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.029
摘要
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the ability of 3 commonly used frailty measures to predict short-term clinical outcomes in older patients admitted for post-acute inpatient rehabilitation. Design
Observational cohort study. Setting and Participants
Consecutive patients (n = 207) admitted to a geriatric inpatient rehabilitation facility. Methods
Frailty on admission was assessed using a frailty index, the physical frailty phenotype, and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Predictive capacity of the frailty instruments was analyzed for (1) nonhome discharge, (2) readmission to acute care, (3) functional decline, and (4) prolonged length of stay, using multivariate logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results
The number of patients classified as frail was 91 (44.0%) with the frailty index, 134 (64.7%) using the frailty phenotype, and 151 (73.0%) with the CFS. The 3 frailty measures revealed acceptable discriminatory accuracy for nonhome discharge (area under the curve ≥ 0.7) but differed in their predictive ability: the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonhome discharge was highest for the CFS [6.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-21.1], compared to the frailty index (4.1, 95% CI 2.0-8.4) and the frailty phenotype (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.6). For the other outcomes, discriminatory accuracy based on ROC tended to be lower and predictive ability varied according to frailty measure. Readmission to acute care from inpatient rehabilitation was predicted by all instruments, most pronounced by the frailty phenotype (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.6-18.8) and the frailty index (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), and less so by the CFS (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-3.8). Conclusions and Implications
Frailty measures may contribute to improved prediction of outcomes in geriatric inpatient rehabilitation. The choice of the instrument may depend on the individual outcome of interest and the corresponding discriminatory ability of the frailty measure.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI