American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

医学 肥厚性心肌病 心脏病学 内科学 临床心脏病学
作者
Barry J. Maron,William J. McKenna,Gordon K. Danielson,Lukas Kappenberger,H. Kuhn,Christine E. Seidman,Pravin M. Shah,William H. Spencer,Paolo Spirito,Folkert J. ten Cate,E.Douglas Wigle,Robert A. Vogel,Jonathan Abrams,Eric Bates,Bruce R. Brodie,Peter G. Danias,Gabriel Gregoratos,Mark A. Hlatky,Judith S. Hochman,Sanjiv Kaul,Robert Lichtenberg,Jonathan R. Lindner,Robert A. O’Rourke,Gerald M. Pohost,Richard S. Schofield,Cynthia M. Tracy,William L. Winters,Werner Klein,Silvia G. Priori,Ángeles Alonso-García,Tomasz Podolecki,Guy De Backer,Jaap W. Deckers,Markus Flather,J Hradec,Ali Oto,Alexander Parkhomenko,Sigmund Silber,Adam Torbicki
出处
期刊:Journal of the American College of Cardiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:42 (9): 1687-1713 被引量:1547
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00941-0
摘要

This document has been developed as a Clinical Expert Consensus Document (CECD), combining the resources of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).It is intended to provide a perspective on the current state of management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Clinical Expert Consensus Documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of the ACCF and the ESC concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community.Topics chosen for coverage by expert consensus documents are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or the clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/ AHA) Practice Guidelines process.Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation.Thus, the reader should view the CECD as the best attempt of the ACC and the ESC to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or the evidence to date is not widely accepted.When feasible, CECDs include indications or contraindications.Some topics covered by CECDs will be addressed subsequently by the ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines Committee.The Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel.Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest to inform the writing effort.These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cici发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
灵络发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
英姑应助後知後孓采纳,获得10
2秒前
机灵鹏笑完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
chenxilia发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
KQ2077完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
BBC完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
wanci应助燕不留声采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
六哥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
无语凝噎发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
六六发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
阿恒完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
咸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
俞水云完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
MYSHOW完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ding完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
89哥发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
李昀蔓发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
天天快乐应助晴q采纳,获得10
8秒前
陈0702_发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
牛角包发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lllllkkkj完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
好学生发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
琪琪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
李健应助花生壳采纳,获得10
10秒前
行7发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
2026 Hospital Accreditation Standards 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6265445
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8087107
关于积分的说明 16902489
捐赠科研通 5335785
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2839882
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1817217
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1670691