作者
Barry J. Maron,William J. McKenna,Gordon K. Danielson,Lukas Kappenberger,H. Kuhn,Christine E. Seidman,Pravin M. Shah,William H. Spencer,Paolo Spirito,Folkert J. ten Cate,E.Douglas Wigle,Robert A. Vogel,Jonathan Abrams,Eric Bates,Bruce R. Brodie,Peter G. Danias,Gabriel Gregoratos,Mark A. Hlatky,Judith S. Hochman,Sanjiv Kaul,Robert Lichtenberg,Jonathan R. Lindner,Robert A. O’Rourke,Gerald M. Pohost,Richard S. Schofield,Cynthia M. Tracy,William L. Winters,Werner Klein,Silvia G. Priori,Ángeles Alonso-García,Tomasz Podolecki,Guy De Backer,Jaap W. Deckers,Markus Flather,J Hradec,Ali Oto,Alexander Parkhomenko,Sigmund Silber,Adam Torbicki
摘要
This document has been developed as a Clinical Expert Consensus Document (CECD), combining the resources of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).It is intended to provide a perspective on the current state of management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Clinical Expert Consensus Documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of the ACCF and the ESC concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community.Topics chosen for coverage by expert consensus documents are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or the clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/ AHA) Practice Guidelines process.Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation.Thus, the reader should view the CECD as the best attempt of the ACC and the ESC to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or the evidence to date is not widely accepted.When feasible, CECDs include indications or contraindications.Some topics covered by CECDs will be addressed subsequently by the ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines Committee.The Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel.Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest to inform the writing effort.These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.