医学
肌萎缩侧索硬化
肺活量
临床试验
仰卧位
坐
物理疗法
随机对照试验
内科学
扩散能力
肺功能
疾病
病理
肺
作者
Michael Bauer,David Czell,Steffen Hartmann,Boleslaw Goldman,D Müller,Markus Weber
出处
期刊:Respiration
[S. Karger AG]
日期:2012-01-01
卷期号:84 (4): 306-311
被引量:20
摘要
<b><i>Background:</i></b> The forced vital capacity (FVC) is an established measure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. Recently the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) test has been increasingly used as a respiratory measure. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> It was the aim of this study to assess the feasibility of SNIP as an outcome measure in a phase III clinical trial with a lead-in design. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty patients were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. FVC, SNIP in sitting (SNIPsitt) and supine (SNIPsup) positions, and the ALS functional rating scale score (ALSFRS-R) were measured every 4 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Complete data were available for 19 patients over 5 months. Baseline values were normal for FVC (101 ± 14%) but abnormal for SNIPsitt and SNIPsup (84 ± 34% and 82 ± 33%). While FVC and ALSFRS-R declined in parallel, SNIPsitt measures declined significantly less compared to ALSFRS-R (p < 0.05) and FVC (p < 0.001) up to 4 months after enrollment. Over 50% of patients still had values equal to or above baseline SNIPsitt measures after 3 months despite abnormal baseline values. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The delayed decline in SNIP measurements suggests a learning effect over time. The optimal number of SNIPs in ALS clinical trials has yet to be determined. SNIP measures should be used with caution in trials with a lead-in design.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI