奥拉帕尼
阿比曲酮
前列腺癌
危险系数
医学
肿瘤科
安慰剂
临床终点
癌症
内科学
PARP抑制剂
泌尿科
置信区间
临床试验
生物
病理
聚ADP核糖聚合酶
雄激素受体
替代医学
基因
聚合酶
生物化学
作者
Noel W. Clarke,Andrew J. Armstrong,Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin,Mototsugu Oya,Neal D. Shore,Eugenia Loredo,Giuseppe Procopio,Juliana de Menezes,Gustavo Girotto,Çağatay Arslan,Niven Mehra,Francis Parnis,Emma Brown,Friederike Schlürmann,Jae Young Joung,Mikio Sugimoto,Juan Antonio Virizuela,Urban Emmenegger,Jiří Navrátil,Gary L. Buchschacher,Christian Poehlein,Elizabeth A. Harrington,Chintu Desai,Jinyu Kang,Fred Saad
出处
期刊:NEJM evidence
[New England Journal of Medicine]
日期:2022-06-03
卷期号:1 (9)
被引量:231
标识
DOI:10.1056/evidoa2200043
摘要
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies and results of a phase 2 trial of abiraterone and olaparib suggest a combined antitumor effect when the poly(adenosine diphosphate[ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib is combined with next-generation hormonal agent abiraterone to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, phase 3 trial of abiraterone and olaparib versus abiraterone and placebo in patients with mCRPC in the first-line setting. Patients were enrolled regardless of homologous recombination repair gene mutation (HRRm) status. HRRm status was determined following enrollment by tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA tests. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive abiraterone (1000 mg once daily) plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival (ibPFS) by investigator assessment. Overall survival was among the secondary end points. RESULTS: At this planned primary analysis at the first data cutoff, median ibPFS was significantly longer in the abiraterone and olaparib arm than in the abiraterone and placebo arm (24.8 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.81; P<0.001) and was consistent with blinded independent central review (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.74). At this data cutoff, overall survival data were immature (28.6% maturity; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12; P=0.29). The safety profile of olaparib and abiraterone was consistent with the known safety profiles of the individual drugs. The most common adverse events in the abiraterone and olaparib arm were anemia, fatigue/asthenia, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: At primary analysis at this first data cutoff, abiraterone combined with olaparib significantly prolonged ibPFS compared with abiraterone and placebo as first-line treatment for patients with mCRPC enrolled irrespective of HRRm status. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03732820.)